Automated Quantitative Image Evaluation of Antigen Retrieval Methods for 17 Antibodies in Placentation and Implantation Diagnostic and Research

Abstract

Immunostaining in clinical routine and research highly depends on standardized staining methods and quantitative image analyses. We qualitatively and quantitatively compared antigen retrieval methods (no pretreatment, pretreatment with pepsin, and heat-induced pretreatment with pH 6 or pH 9) for 17 antibodies relevant for placenta and implantation diagnostics and research. Using our newly established, comprehensive automated quantitative image analysis approach, fluorescent signal intensities were evaluated. Automated quantitative image analysis found that 9 out of 17 antibodies needed antigen retrieval to show positive staining. Heat induction proved to be the most efficient form of antigen retrieval. Eight markers stained positive after pepsin digestion, with β-hCG and vWF showing enhanced staining intensities. To avoid the misinterpretation of quantitative image data, the qualitative aspect should always be considered. Results from native placental tissue were compared with sections of a placental invasion model based on thermo-sensitive scaffolds. Immunostaining on placentas in vitro leads to new insights into fetal development and maternal pathophysiological pathways, as pregnant women are justifiably excluded from clinical studies. Thus, there is a clear need for the assessment of reliable immunofluorescent staining and pretreatment methods. Our evaluation offers a powerful tool for antibody and pretreatment selection in placental research providing objective and precise results.

Lipid Nanoparticles as a Shuttle for Anti-Adipogenic miRNAs to Human Adipocytes

“…We examined an area of approximately 50 mm 2 corresponding to an average cell number of 25,000 for each treatment. The large area and high number of analyzed cells highlight the fundamental benefit of automated computer-assisted analysis, which resulted in an objective interpretation of the data [ 59 , 60 ]. This allowed for a more accurate description of immunostaining results compared to analyzing only small image sections, as is often the case with conventional histological studies.…”

“…As a result, our established automated quantitative image analysis pipeline for investigating mitochondrial and UCP1 fluorescence levels served as a powerful tool for reducing operator errors. However, qualitative assessment of fluorescence staining is always required to properly evaluate immunofluorescence specificity and to avoid data misinterpretation [ 59 , 60 , 61 ].…”

Optimized protocol for whole-mount RNA fluorescent in situ hybridization using oxidation-mediated autofluorescence reduction on mouse embryos

“…They may require an antigen retrieval step before photobleaching. 13 In these cases, the use of other protocols is recommended. 14 , 15 …”