2003
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2003.815864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Automated 3-D PDM construction from segmented images using deformable models

Abstract: In recent years, several methods have been proposed for constructing statistical shape models to aid image analysis tasks by providing a priori knowledge. Examples include principal component analysis of manually or semiautomatically placed corresponding landmarks on the learning shapes [point distribution models (PDMs)], which is time consuming and subjective. However, automatically establishing surface correspondences continues to be a difficult problem. This paper presents a novel method for the automated c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
77
1
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
77
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, such models are not directly available from standard segmentation algorithms (such as the Marching Cubes procedure [24]) since these include inside and outside information into the meshes. One solution is the use of statistically trained deformable models (ASM), in which a mean shape of the bone outer surface is deformed characteristically to best fit the patient CT data [20][21][22]27]. Using leaveone-out experiments, these studies typically report mean 3D surface deviations of 1.5 mm (max: 3 mm) [22] and 1.79 mm (max: 5.75 mm) [21] for the proximal femur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Unfortunately, such models are not directly available from standard segmentation algorithms (such as the Marching Cubes procedure [24]) since these include inside and outside information into the meshes. One solution is the use of statistically trained deformable models (ASM), in which a mean shape of the bone outer surface is deformed characteristically to best fit the patient CT data [20][21][22]27]. Using leaveone-out experiments, these studies typically report mean 3D surface deviations of 1.5 mm (max: 3 mm) [22] and 1.79 mm (max: 5.75 mm) [21] for the proximal femur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is fully understandable in the case of in-vivo imaging of brain or other soft tissues, where opening up the cadaver for dissection and measurement causes a collapse of the soft tissue target structure. A possible solution is to perform relative comparisons, e.g., by comparing with another, clinically established, imaging technique [15]; by performing leave-one-out experiments when working with a statistical database approach and training set for testing the accuracy of deformable models data [20][21][22]; or by checking coherency within the same data set [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model is automatically generated from a set of L segmented images [6]. First, a shape template is generated by triangulation of an arbitrarily selected image, which is adapted to each of the remaining images by rigid and non-rigid adaptation (see above).…”
Section: Integration Of Prior Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier work by this group proposed shape constrained deformable models, enabling local deviation from a statistical shape model by embedding it into a 3D triangular deformable mesh [6,11]. This approach used deterministic feature search and was successfully applied to segment bones in CT.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%