2012
DOI: 10.1002/sce.21034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Background Previous studies suggest that many persons with disabilities caused by work do not receive workers' compensation benefits. Methods Data from surveys of persons with disabilities were used to estimate the proportion of disability due to work‐related injuries and diseases. Studies examining the proportion of workers with work‐related disability who received workers' compensation benefits were reviewed. Legal and other factors explaining the lack of receipt of workers' compensation benefits were examin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(103 reference statements)
0
7
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Making and recording observations, making predictions, and designing investigations are smaller practices involved in the science practice of carrying out investigations called for by the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS Lead States, ). Constructing evidence‐based claims and providing justification for predictions are elements of the practices of constructing explanations and scientific argumentation (Berland & McNeill, 2012; NGSS Lead States, ; Osborne & Patterson, ). We focused on these practices due to their alignment with the original curriculum materials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Making and recording observations, making predictions, and designing investigations are smaller practices involved in the science practice of carrying out investigations called for by the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS Lead States, ). Constructing evidence‐based claims and providing justification for predictions are elements of the practices of constructing explanations and scientific argumentation (Berland & McNeill, 2012; NGSS Lead States, ; Osborne & Patterson, ). We focused on these practices due to their alignment with the original curriculum materials.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these authors, such explanations would be inconsistent with any of the explanatory models in the philosophy of science. Osborne and Patterson (2012) also criticise the use of this structure to refer to an explanation, since to them, the elements cited earlier pertain to an argument. To show this, they quote Toulmin's argumentative model, setting forth its main elements: data, claim, and warrant (Toulmin, 1958), and showing how these can be associated with evidence, claims, and reasoning.…”
Section: Explanation In Science Educationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Any attempt to address these two components is entangled with elaborate philosophical discourse entailing subtle aspects of the relation between the relevant practices. This topic has been explored to some extent within science education in the case of the relation between explanation and argumentation, and it has yielded useful insights (Berland & McNeil ; Brigandt, ; Osborne & Patterson, ). The distinction and connections between developing explanations and building models has not received consistent, explicit attention within science education so far.…”
Section: Ensuing Implications and Concluding Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%