2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory–visual integration during nonconscious perception

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, their findings can be explained by association and comparison of information from different senses that may be maintained unconsciously in working memory processes as has previously been demonstrated 68 70 . This result, along with studies showing that the McGurk illusion falters under Continuous flash suppression 29 , 30 , supports the hypothesis that only low (i.e. spatial), but not high level (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, their findings can be explained by association and comparison of information from different senses that may be maintained unconsciously in working memory processes as has previously been demonstrated 68 70 . This result, along with studies showing that the McGurk illusion falters under Continuous flash suppression 29 , 30 , supports the hypothesis that only low (i.e. spatial), but not high level (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…These results therefore suggest that invisible flashes can influence sound perception via mechanisms of audiovisual integration. By contrast, the McGurk illusion, which arises for instance by integrating a ‘ba’ phoneme with a ‘ga’ viseme into an illusionary ‘da’ percept 28 , is abolished when the facial articulatory movements are suppressed from observers’ awareness 29 , 30 . These discrepancies may be explained by the fact that the spatial ventriloquist illusion relies on low level spatial cues, while the McGurk illusion requires the extraction and integration of complex phonological features (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Importantly, expectations based on visual perception can create illusory auditory percepts (Mcgurk and Macdonald, 1976 ) and expectations based on auditory percepts can create illusory tactile percepts (Jousmäki and Hari, 1998 ). Such intermodal illusions provided support for a “global workspace” model of conscious attention (Baars, 2007 ) but they can arise without conscious perception (Ching et al, 2019 ). During a sleeplike state induced by ketamine/xylazine anesthesia in rats, the intracellular responses of neurons in primary somatosensory (S1) cortex to repetitive patterns of electrotactile stimulation of the paw were modulated by microstimulation of remote cortical areas that generated no direct responses in S1 (Etemadi et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: The Biological Substratementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several studies also suggest that auditory perception is affected by subliminal visual stimuli (Delong et al, 2018;Delong & Noppeney, 2021;Doi & Shinohara, 2015). There are also reports of audio-visual integration when both types of stimuli are subliminal (Ching et al, 2019;Faivre et al, 2014;Scott et al, 2018) and of audio-olfactory integration during sleep (Arzi et al, 2012).…”
Section: Multisensorymentioning
confidence: 99%