1998
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-998-1023-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Auditory perception of relative distance of traffic sounds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, an auditory perception experiment was carried out to obtain an effective length for which bicyclists will perceive the presence of a vehicle behind them. Barnecutt and Pfeffer (1998) states the difficulty and inaccuracy in estimating distance from loudness of sound. Nevertheless, the experiment herein is to determine when a vehicle sound is heard and not the intensity of it.…”
Section: Ambient Traffic Density (Atd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, an auditory perception experiment was carried out to obtain an effective length for which bicyclists will perceive the presence of a vehicle behind them. Barnecutt and Pfeffer (1998) states the difficulty and inaccuracy in estimating distance from loudness of sound. Nevertheless, the experiment herein is to determine when a vehicle sound is heard and not the intensity of it.…”
Section: Ambient Traffic Density (Atd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies have psycho-physically examined the acuity of absolute auditory depth perception 29,33,[37][38][39][40][41] and relative auditory depth perception. [42][43][44][45][46][47] Literature addressing absolute auditory depth perception far outweighs that addressing relative auditory depth perception. This is perhaps surprising, as sounds are rarely heard in isolation.…”
Section: Acuity Of Auditory Depth Perceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Barnecutt and Pfeffer [1995] investigated auditory distance perception in traffic. Apart from level differences, they suggest that nonauditory criteria, like past experience or visual imagery, are so important factors for auditory interpretation.…”
Section: Pedestrian Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%