1979
Auditory Brain Stem Evoked Responses to Bone-Conducted Signals
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
55
4
4
0
Citation Types
2
23
0
2
Year Published
1981
2025
Publication Types
Select...
56
4
1
Relationship
0
61
Authors
Journals
Cited by 61 publications
(27 citation statements)
References 8 publications
2
23
0
2
“……”
Section: Air and Bone Abr L-i Functions 123supporting
confidence: 92%
“……”
Section: Air and Bone Abr L-i Functions 123supporting
confidence: 92%
“……”
Section: Air and Bone Abr L-i Functions 121supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Another candidate for the early signal would be bone conduction versus air conduction. However, bone conduction has been reported with longer, not shorter, latencies than air conduction, and thus, yields no explanation for the short latency of the first component [31], [32]. Artifacts caused by laser light interactions with the electrode could be ruled out since the signal disappeared ~4 min postmortem in the euthanized animal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…x Two case reports are included to illustrate the management of early investigation for hearing loss and infants, and only sporadic reports that discuss the BC-ABR in the presence of conductive HL in infants or adults are documented. 23,34 Despite the aforementioned limitations, considerable evidence suggests that bone conduction ABR testing can make important contributions to the assessment of hearing in infants. Furthermore, modi cations of test protocols can minimize some of these technical limitations allowing BC-ABR to be used as an additional tool in the differential diagnosis between conductive and sensorineural hearing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
