Auditor-Provided Nonaudit Services and Audit Effectiveness and Efficiency: Evidence from Pre- and Post-SOX Audit Report Lags

Abstract

SUMMARY The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) effectively bars an auditor from providing nonaudit services to an audit client based on the belief that the resulting economic bonding undermines the auditor's independence and quality of the audit (U.S. House of Representatives 2002). The accounting profession has strongly debated this view and counter-argues that auditor-provided nonaudit services benefit the client. We contribute to this debate by examining the effect of auditor-provided nonaudit services on the effectiveness and efficiency of the audit. We find that higher nonaudit service fees are associated with shorter audit report lags—a potential indicator of audit efficiency—prior to the passage of SOX, but such effects dissipate after SOX. We find that discretionary accruals and financial restatements—potential indicators of audit effectiveness—do not increase when shorter audit lags occur in conjunction with high nonaudit service fees. We also find that the firms with the highest levels of nonaudit service fees prior to SOX have the largest increase in audit lags after SOX. These results suggest that there is some merit to the profession's argument that auditor-provided nonaudit services benefit clients without leading to a loss of audit effectiveness. Data Availability: All data are publicly available from sources identified in the text.

Is the type of outsourced internal audit function provider associated with audit efficiency? Empirical evidence from Oman

“…We control for client complexity, including company size ( SIZE ), inventory ( INV ), and current ratio ( CURT ). Research argues that client complexity is associated with higher audit effort and, consequently, higher audit fees and longer audit report lag (Gros et al, ; Knechel & Sharma, ). We also include performance ( ROA ), prior losses ( LOSS ), debt ( DBT ), concentrated ownership ( COWSHP ), and growth ( GRW ) to control for the client's financial condition and client‐specific risk.…”

Does Corporate Tax Aggressiveness Influence Audit Pricing?

“…Yet, knowledge spillovers and efficiencies achieved by having a single professional service firm act as both auditor and consultant can also benefit shareholders (Simunic ; Beck, Frecka, and Solomon ; Omer et al. ; Knechel and Sharma ). Thus, the link between audit fees and nonaudit services is complex.…”

Non‐Audit Services and Knowledge Spillovers: Evidence from New Zealand

“…Prior large sample empirical evidence has generally supported the argument that auditor‐provided non‐audit services do not diminish the quality of the audit (e.g., Ashbaugh et al, 2003; DeFond et al, 2002; Kinney et al, 2004; and Raghunandan et al, 2003). Knechel and Sharma (2010) add to this literature by examining the association between auditor‐provided non‐audit services and both the effectiveness and efficiency of audits. They argue that knowledge spillovers from non‐audit services may result in a more efficient audit but only as long as the services do not undermine the quality of the audit.…”