1977
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.113.11.1576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atypical multicentric reticulohistiocytosis with paraproteinemia

Abstract: Two women had multiple subcutaneous nodules that showed features of multicentric reticulohistiocytosis (MR). Neither had joint symptoms. Both had a raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate, an immunoglobulin G paraproteinemia, and raised levels of nonhepatic serum alkaline phosphatase. The skin lesions have been followed up, using light and electron microscopy, immunoperoxidase, and histochemical methods. The material in the giant cells stained positively for gamma heavy chain determinants: the light chain type i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A cephalocaudal distribution of the nodules has been described [2] and sometimes a diffuse, irritable erythema or severe pruritus precedes the appearance of the more characteristic nodules [4,5,6,7]. Other atypical findings in MRH are hypochromic plaques [8], telangiectasias [9, 10], deep nodules [11,12,13,14], erythroderma[15] and neurofibroma-like nodules [16]. Palpebral xanthelasma-like lesions were observed in 17% of cases in a review including 96 patients [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A cephalocaudal distribution of the nodules has been described [2] and sometimes a diffuse, irritable erythema or severe pruritus precedes the appearance of the more characteristic nodules [4,5,6,7]. Other atypical findings in MRH are hypochromic plaques [8], telangiectasias [9, 10], deep nodules [11,12,13,14], erythroderma[15] and neurofibroma-like nodules [16]. Palpebral xanthelasma-like lesions were observed in 17% of cases in a review including 96 patients [3].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%