Attractive forces slow contact formation between deformable bodies underwater

Abstract

Thermodynamics tells us to expect underwater contact between two hydrophobic surfaces to result in stronger adhesion compared to two hydrophilic surfaces. However, the presence of water changes not only energetics but also the dynamic process of reaching a final state, which couples solid deformation and liquid evacuation. These dynamics can create challenges for achieving strong underwater adhesion/friction, which affects diverse fields including soft robotics, biolocomotion, and tire traction. Closer investigation, requiring sufficiently precise resolution of film evacuation while simultaneously controlling surface wettability, has been lacking. We perform high-resolution in situ frustrated total internal reflection imaging to track underwater contact evolution between soft-elastic hemispheres of varying stiffness and smooth–hard surfaces of varying wettability. Surprisingly, we find the exponential rate of water evacuation from hydrophobic–hydrophobic (adhesive) contact is three orders of magnitude lower than that from hydrophobic–hydrophilic (nonadhesive) contact. The trend of decreasing rate with decreasing wettability of glass sharply changes about a point where thermodynamic adhesion crosses zero, suggesting a transition in mode of evacuation, which is illuminated by three-dimensional spatiotemporal height maps. Adhesive contact is characterized by the early localization of sealed puddles, whereas nonadhesive contact remains smooth, with film-wise evacuation from one central puddle. Measurements with a human thumb and alternatively hydrophobic/hydrophilic glass surface demonstrate practical consequences of the same dynamics: adhesive interactions cause instability in valleys and lead to a state of more trapped water and less intimate solid–solid contact. These findings offer interpretation of patterned texture seen in underwater biolocomotive adaptations as well as insight toward technological implementation.

Underwater Adhesives Produced by Chemically Induced Protein Aggregation

“…[5] It is difficult to completely re-move water from the interface of two materials brought into contact; the chemical functionality of the adherend and adhesive are crucial factors. [52][53][54][55] Interestingly, the addition of silica was found to increase adhesion with non-polar surfaces, such as polycarbonate and ABS, yet decrease adhesion with polar surfaces such as aluminum. Our observations point to a more complex role where silica does not make direct interactions with material surfaces.…”

A Pressure-Sensitive Bioadhesive for Wet Tissues and Organs

“…1a). However, existing PSAs are not designed for use on wet surfaces, and therefore, exhibit poor adhesion performance on wet tissues and organs 1,4,5 .…”

Instant and Tough Adhesives for Rapid Gastric Perforation and Traumatic Pneumothorax Sealing

“…However, hydrophobic design alone does not produce the best‐wet adhesion owing to incomplete contact caused by trapped small water puddles derived from the rough nm‐length scale channels, even for hydrophobic pairs. [ 29 ] Thus, rapid water drainage and subsequent residual water removal are crucial in designing a toughly noncovalent adhesion for wet surfaces. Constructing hexagonal smaller facets or dry tapes are feasible in avoiding or adsorbing gap water.…”