2006 1st International Symposium on Systems and Control in Aerospace and Astronautics
DOI: 10.1109/isscaa.2006.1627503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attitude Control of Spinning Satellite Subject to Actuators Restriction Using Eigen Structure Assignment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 1. Assume the satellite's equations of attitude motions as presented in (2)- (4). Provided that the satellite angular velocities are kept on the fractional integral sliding surface S = 0 defined in (9) and the sliding surface is an invariant set (i.e.…”
Section: Controller Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theorem 1. Assume the satellite's equations of attitude motions as presented in (2)- (4). Provided that the satellite angular velocities are kept on the fractional integral sliding surface S = 0 defined in (9) and the sliding surface is an invariant set (i.e.…”
Section: Controller Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different controller architectures based on the different torque sources have been proposed in the literatures. For example reaction and momentum wheel-based [2][3][4], thruster-based [5,6] and magnetorquers-based approaches [7][8][9] have been proposed to solve satellite attitude control prob-Manuscript received October 22, 2017; revised April 8, 2018; accepted May 19, 2018.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different control strategies have been proposed to avoid these singularities or, at least, handle them efficiently (Kennel, 1970;Li and Bainum, 1990;Krishnan and Vadali, 1996;Kurokawa, 1997 A few researchers have suggested using double-gimbal CMGs to avoid singularities (Wie, 1998;Ahmed and Bernstein, 2002;Bolandi et al, 2006), a solution that is more costly and complex for the dynamical modeling view point (Wie, 1998). McMahon and Schaub (2010), Richie and Lappas (2007), and Jin and Hwang (2011) have designed variable-speed control moment gyroscopes to produce the exact effective torque required at the cost of increasing the difficulty of dynamical modelling and controller design.…”
Section: Control Moment Gyrosmentioning
confidence: 99%