1979
DOI: 10.1190/1.1440970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Attenuation of seismic waves in dry and saturated rocks: II. Mechanisms

Abstract: Theoretical models based on several hypothesized attenuation mechanisms are discussed in relation to published data on the effects of pressure and fluid saturation on attenuation. These mechanisms include friction, fluid flow, viscous relaxation, and scattering. The application of these models to the ultrasonic data of ToksGz et al (1979, this issue) indicates that friction on thin cracks and grain boundaries is the dominant attenuation mechanism for consolidated rocks under most conditions in the earth' s upp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
237
0
6

Year Published

1987
1987
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 441 publications
(262 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
11
237
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…17) calculated from the Q values shown in Table 2. For OBS records within the 10-120 km distance interval, where the waves travel at shallow depths, the crust contains microcracks, and the rocks are fluid saturated (e.g., Johnston et al, 1979;Winkler and Nur, 1982), we find that P waves attenuate more than S waves for frequencies between 0.6 and 12.6 Hz. On the contrary, we find for the 120-220 km interval (for deeper travel paths) that S waves attenuate more than P waves up to 3.5 Hz, indicating that in the lower crust and upper mantle the temperature must be higher and the rocks probably less fractured.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…17) calculated from the Q values shown in Table 2. For OBS records within the 10-120 km distance interval, where the waves travel at shallow depths, the crust contains microcracks, and the rocks are fluid saturated (e.g., Johnston et al, 1979;Winkler and Nur, 1982), we find that P waves attenuate more than S waves for frequencies between 0.6 and 12.6 Hz. On the contrary, we find for the 120-220 km interval (for deeper travel paths) that S waves attenuate more than P waves up to 3.5 Hz, indicating that in the lower crust and upper mantle the temperature must be higher and the rocks probably less fractured.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…De nombreuses études expérimentales aussi bien in situ qu'au laboratoire ont montré la validité de cette affir mation. Citons pour mémoire TOKSÔZ et al (1979), JOHNSTON et TOKSÖZ (1980aet 1980b), STACEY et GLADWIN (1981) et BLAIR et al (1984. Le para mètre le plus couramment utilisé pour caractériser l'atténuation est le facteur de qualité (Q).…”
Section: Mesures De L'atténuation Des Ondes P Et Sunclassified
“…[Knopoff, 1971]. In porous and/or densely fractured media permeated by fluids, seismic attenuation depends in a complicated way on different factors as the degree of saturation, fluid type, and static pressure [Johnston et al, 1979]. In rock volumes saturated with a low viscosity fluid (e.g., water and oil), laboratory measurements at ultrasonic frequencies using a pulse amplitude technique found Q P < Q S for partially saturated rock samples .…”
Section: P and S Wave Shallow Crustal Attenuationmentioning
confidence: 99%