Citation for published item:gentif nti @n¡ ee wu£ nozAD vFgF @PHHWA 9g llousEunemotion l tr its re rel ted to om ined de( its in re ognizing fr id f es nd ody posesF9D tourn l of the emeri n e demy of ghild nd edoles ent sy hi tryFD RV @SAF ppF SSRESTPF Further information on publisher's website:httpXGGdxFdoiForgGIHFIHWUGgrsFH HIQeQIVIW PRIW Publisher's copyright statement: NOTICE: this is the author's version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be re ected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A de nitive version was subsequently published in Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 48/5, 2009, 10.1097 Additional information:
Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-pro t purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details. In press. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
Callous-Unemotional Traits 2 AbstractObjective: The aim of the present study was to examine accuracy in labeling body poses conveying fear. Youths with callous-unemotional traits experience emotional processing deficits seemingly on par with deficits displayed by patients with amygdala damage. That is, there is growing evidence that children with callous-unemotional traits have problems recognizing afraid emotional expressions. Although people with amygdala damage show deficits in labeling afraid faces, they have an intact ability to label afraid body poses.Method: Boys (N=55; ages 8-16) from a community center were recruited to label emotional faces and static body poses and to complete the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits and a measure of violence and antisocial behavior.Results: Callous-unemotional traits were related to poorer accuracy when labeling afraid faces and afraid body postures. However, when response bias was taken into account, callous-unemotional traits were related to deficits in many facial expressions. Notably, the combination of poorly labeling afraid faces and body poses was linked to the highest levels of callous-unemotional traits and violence.Conclusion: Findings support a generalized deficit in processing displays of fear that are not specific to faces. The results support the argument that a general 'fear-blindness' is related to a lack of empathy and to violence and antisocial behavior. Methodological issues with regard deci...