Long standing interest in individual differences linked to the experience of, and adjustment to, pain has recently expanded to include the "attachment styles" (Bowlby, 1982) of both pain patients and their caregivers. Following a brief review of the nature and origin of attachment styles, we review recent research addressing issues regarding attachment and pain and offer suggested directions for future research. Bowlby (1982) proposed that the attachment system is formed during infancy and early childhood based upon the nature of the child's interactions with primary caregivers, particularly interactions surrounding affect regulation and management of distress. Theoretically, attachment behaviors (such as seeking closeness and comfort from a caregiver) are triggered by threats of three kinds: threats to the subjective availability of the caregiver, internal distress (e.g., from hunger, illness, or pain), or external threats to safety or wellbeing. Based on the pattern of caregiver responses during these early interactions, the child develops specific internal mental models or schemas regarding themselves and others that form the basis of enduring strategies for need satisfaction and affect regulation. These mental models (or "attachment styles") tend to remain stable "from cradle to grave" (Bowlby, 1982), and affect cognitions, emotions and behaviors in virtually all domains of life (see Mikulincer & Shaver, 2003 for a review of the development and impact of attachment styles).
The Concept of AttachmentAttachment researchers have identified four attachment styles that vary along two dimensions: attachment anxiety (worry over the availability, responsiveness, and positive regard of others) and attachment avoidance (discomfort with closeness and interdependence). Those with a "secure" attachment style are low on both dimensions, whereas "preoccupied" persons are high in anxiety but low in avoidance, "dismissing" persons are high in avoidance and low in anxiety, and "fearful" persons are high in both.Of particular importance to the issue of the experience and management of pain, attachment style has been linked to appraisal of and reactions to threats of all kinds (Mikulincer & Shaver, 2003, in press). Secure persons tend to engage in the most realistic appraisal of threats, possess greater optimism and self-efficacy regarding threat-related management and outcomes, and experience the most positive outcomes. Both dimensions of attachment insecurity, however, are associated with less optimal emotions and behaviors.