2018
DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/122/47002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomically thin mononitrides SiN and GeN: New two-dimensional wide band gap semiconductors

Abstract: Low-dimensional Si-based semiconductors are unique materials that can both match well with the Si-based electronics and satisfy the demand of miniaturization in modern industry. Owing to the lack of such materials, many researchers put their efforts into this field. In this work, employing a swarm structure search method and density functional theory, we theoretically predict two-dimensional atomically thin mononitrides SiN and GeN, both of which present semiconducting nature. Furthermore study shows that SiN … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was shown that the indirect bandgap is 1.55 eV, though it is known that the standard DFT methods underestimate the bandgap. For comparison, the previously predicted two‐layered 2D SiN is a semiconductor with a bandgap of 2.75 eV . Note that the structural and electric properties of monolayered and two‐layered SiN are different.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It was shown that the indirect bandgap is 1.55 eV, though it is known that the standard DFT methods underestimate the bandgap. For comparison, the previously predicted two‐layered 2D SiN is a semiconductor with a bandgap of 2.75 eV . Note that the structural and electric properties of monolayered and two‐layered SiN are different.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…For comparison, the previously predicted two-layered 2D SiN is a semiconductor with a bandgap of 2.75 eV. [57] Note that the structural and electric properties of monolayered and two-layered SiN are different. This can be ascribed to the different types of interactions between the layers (covalent chemical Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…This performance can be explained by the shorter radius of N atom and stronger coupling between Si and surface N atoms. However, this value is larger than ∼1.73 Å in Si 3 N 4 and 1.76 Å in 2D SiN given by calculations or experiments 29,30 , the reason is that the formation of B-N bonds weakens the interaction between Si and surface N atoms in this sample. The length of Si-Si bonds is ∼2.56 Å, this value is some larger than 2.37 and 2.28 Å in monocrystalline Si and silicene calculated in this work via the same accuracy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Qian et al 216 designed a 2D germanium mononitride (GeN) belonging to the space group P6true¯m2, which is similar to hexagonal GeP. The buckling degree Δ of GeN is 0.67 Å, which is slightly higher than that of pure germanene.…”
Section: Ge‐va Binary Compoundsmentioning
confidence: 99%