1992
DOI: 10.1016/0965-9773(92)90076-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atomic structure and thermal stability of nanostructured Y-Fe alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The functional form of this relationship is a signature of thermodynamic stabilization, and is widely observed in experimental data on this subject. 27,[32][33][34]37 Such scaling is an inherent consequence of Eq. ͑8͒, where the…”
Section: Equilibrium Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The functional form of this relationship is a signature of thermodynamic stabilization, and is widely observed in experimental data on this subject. 27,[32][33][34]37 Such scaling is an inherent consequence of Eq. ͑8͒, where the…”
Section: Equilibrium Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…͑2͒, it is evident that the grain boundary energy can be reduced by enhancing the solute excess, and if the magnitude of this reduction is sufficient to drive ␥ to zero, the grain boundaries can apparently exist in equilibrium. Extremely fine nanocrystalline grain sizes have been realized in a variety of binary alloy systems, for example Y-Fe, 32 Ni-P, 33 Pd-Zr, 27,34 and Fe-Zr. 35 Because the elements composing these alloys are highly immiscible with a large positive heat of mixing, these systems are classified as strongly segregating, with high assumed values of H seg ͑Ն0.5 eV͒ that can substantially reduce the grain boundary energy via Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the driving force for grain boundary migration becomes zero and the grains ought to be stable. 9) An additional advantage of this approach is that the segregating element does not cause any additional strengthening as long as its solubility in the matrix is sufficiently low. Atomistic simulations by Millet et al 10) support this concept, but only a few systems such as YFe, 9) and NiW, NiB and NiS 10) have so far shown experimental promise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9) An additional advantage of this approach is that the segregating element does not cause any additional strengthening as long as its solubility in the matrix is sufficiently low. Atomistic simulations by Millet et al 10) support this concept, but only a few systems such as YFe, 9) and NiW, NiB and NiS 10) have so far shown experimental promise. Also, it appears that direct experimental evidence for zero free grain boundary energies, i.e., the absence of grooving at grain boundaries intersecting a free surface, does not exist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1). In most existing studies of nanostructure stability, the selection of an appropriate alloying element has been based on empirical considerations believed (or assumed) to correlate with GB segregation, including size mismatch [6][7][8][9][10] , low bulk solubility 7,8,[11][12][13][14][15] , or cohesive energy [16][17][18] . However, some of the more successful experimental systems with stabilized nanostructures have relatively modest values of ∆H seg , including Ni-W (∆H seg ~ 10 kJ/mol) 19,20 and Pd-Zr (∆H seg ~ 31 kJ/mol) 21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%