2015
DOI: 10.7780/kjrs.2015.31.4.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Atmospheric Correction Problems with Multi-Temporal High Spatial Resolution Images from Different Satellite Sensors

Abstract: Since the launch of the IKONOS-1 in 1999 and several other following commercial satellites, High Spatial Resolution (HSR) satellite images have been widely used for topographic mapping, Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data generation, and urban and land cover classifications. On the other hand, it has been relatively rare to find quantitative applications for extracting biophysical parameters from HSR images.Although there have been a few cases of using HSR images to extract information regarding the physical co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, BRDF was not considered. Moreover, the atmospheric correction result of multi-temporal high spatial resolution images from different satellite sensors was inconsistent owing to unstable radiometric calibration coefficients and different sun-sensor geometries (Lee and Lee, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, BRDF was not considered. Moreover, the atmospheric correction result of multi-temporal high spatial resolution images from different satellite sensors was inconsistent owing to unstable radiometric calibration coefficients and different sun-sensor geometries (Lee and Lee, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It underwent geometric correction utilizing Rational Function Coefficients (RPCs), with further corrections made by selecting Ground Control Points (GCPs) using the Landsat OLI image as a reference. The Top of Atmosphere (TOA) radiance was calculated from gain values and subsequently converted to reflectance [39]. The Landsat OLI data, acquired as Level 1 products from the USGS website, received atmospheric correction through the QUAC model in ENVI 5.6.3 software (NV5 geospatial, Broomfield, CO, USA) [40].…”
Section: Dye Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HS data from different sources often overlap spatially and spectrally, but their integration (to leverage relative advantages or differences in coverage of the various available sensors) and comparison (to assess their relative consistency and resolving ability) radiance, and then we must remove atmospheric and topographic effects to estimate surface reflectance [23]. These pre-processing and correction workflows can be very complex and are a significant source of uncertainty that can greatly influence geological mapping results (e.g., [21,24,25]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%