1987
DOI: 10.2307/2289471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymptotic Properties of Maximum Likelihood Estimators and Likelihood Ratio Tests Under Nonstandard Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
916
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 967 publications
(931 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
14
916
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As M0 represents the case where the variance is constrained to the boundary of the parameter space, the distribution of 4.6 times the LOD score for M1 is a 50 : 50 mixture of a w 2 distribution on one degree of freedom and a point mass at zero. The LOD score for M2 has a more complicated distribution that is a mixture of w 2 random variables, 80 but conservatively, one can use the w 2 with the higher degrees of freedom. To distinguish the type of LOD score reported, we use the term VC-LOD to indicate results from VC analysis, and LOD or LOD max to indicate LOD scores or maximum LOD scores from parametric analysis (see below).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As M0 represents the case where the variance is constrained to the boundary of the parameter space, the distribution of 4.6 times the LOD score for M1 is a 50 : 50 mixture of a w 2 distribution on one degree of freedom and a point mass at zero. The LOD score for M2 has a more complicated distribution that is a mixture of w 2 random variables, 80 but conservatively, one can use the w 2 with the higher degrees of freedom. To distinguish the type of LOD score reported, we use the term VC-LOD to indicate results from VC analysis, and LOD or LOD max to indicate LOD scores or maximum LOD scores from parametric analysis (see below).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a QTL on OAR3 appears to be a common (1) (Self and Liang, 1987 finding across studies, not all have been in the same segment and some large-scale studies (e.g. Crawford et al, 2006) have failed to find any evidence on chromosome 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The test statistic was 22[lnL (QTL) 2 lnL (no QTL) ] where L () is the likelihood of each model. Critical values for the LRT were taken from 1 2 x 2 (1) (Self and Liang, 1987) since the null hypothesis represents a boundary value for the variance component.…”
Section: Statistical Analyses For Qtl Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second step was REML analyses using these matrices as covariance matrices for the QTL effect. The test for a significant variance due to the QTL was performed using a likelihood ratio test (LR) with a 5% significance threshold of 2.71 [23].…”
Section: Interval Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%