2022
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202204021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Asymmetric CoN3P1 Trifunctional Catalyst with Tailored Electronic Structures Enabling Boosted Activities and Corrosion Resistance in an Uninterrupted Seawater Splitting System

Abstract: Employing seawater splitting systems to generate hydrogen can be economically advantageous but still remains challenging, particularly for designing efficient and high Cl−‐corrosion resistant trifunctional catalysts toward the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), oxygen evolution reaction (OER), and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER). Herein, single CoNC catalysts with well‐defined symmetric CoN4 sites are selected as atomic platforms for electronic structure tailoring. Density function theory reveals that P‐dop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
50
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The following supporting information can be downloaded at: , refs. [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ] are cited in this file. Figure S1: (a) Low- and (b) high-magnification SEM images of bare NF; Figure S2: (a) Low- and (b) high-magnification SEM images of Co-B/NF; Figure S3: EDX spectrum of Co-Mo-B/NF; Figure S4: XPS survey spectrum of Co-Mo-B/NF; Figure S5: LSV curves of Co-Mo-B/NF, Co-B/NF, Pt/C, and bare NF for HER in 1 M KOH with a scan rate of 5 mV s –1 (without IR correction); Figure S6: CV curves for Co-Mo-B/NF (a), Co-B/NF (b), and bare NF (c) in the non-Faradaic capacitance current range at scan rates of 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 mV s –1 in 1 M KOH; Figure S7: LSV curves of Co-Mo-B/NF in 1 M KOH, 1 M KOH + 0.5 M NaCl, and 1 M KOH + seawater with a scan rate of 5 mV s –1 (without IR correction); Figure S8: High-resolution XPS spectra of (a) Co 2p, (b) Mo 3d, (c) B 1s, and (d) O 1s regions for Co-Mo-B/NF after stability test in alkaline seawater; Figure S9: The Faradaic efficiency of Co-Mo-B/NF at 100 mA cm –2 in alkaline seawater; Table S1: Comparison of HER performance of Co-Mo-B/NF with recent reported electrocatalysts in alkaline freshwater; Table S2: Comparison of HER performance of Co-Mo-B/NF with recent reported electrocatalysts in alkaline seawater.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following supporting information can be downloaded at: , refs. [ 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 ] are cited in this file. Figure S1: (a) Low- and (b) high-magnification SEM images of bare NF; Figure S2: (a) Low- and (b) high-magnification SEM images of Co-B/NF; Figure S3: EDX spectrum of Co-Mo-B/NF; Figure S4: XPS survey spectrum of Co-Mo-B/NF; Figure S5: LSV curves of Co-Mo-B/NF, Co-B/NF, Pt/C, and bare NF for HER in 1 M KOH with a scan rate of 5 mV s –1 (without IR correction); Figure S6: CV curves for Co-Mo-B/NF (a), Co-B/NF (b), and bare NF (c) in the non-Faradaic capacitance current range at scan rates of 20, 40, 60, 80, and 100 mV s –1 in 1 M KOH; Figure S7: LSV curves of Co-Mo-B/NF in 1 M KOH, 1 M KOH + 0.5 M NaCl, and 1 M KOH + seawater with a scan rate of 5 mV s –1 (without IR correction); Figure S8: High-resolution XPS spectra of (a) Co 2p, (b) Mo 3d, (c) B 1s, and (d) O 1s regions for Co-Mo-B/NF after stability test in alkaline seawater; Figure S9: The Faradaic efficiency of Co-Mo-B/NF at 100 mA cm –2 in alkaline seawater; Table S1: Comparison of HER performance of Co-Mo-B/NF with recent reported electrocatalysts in alkaline freshwater; Table S2: Comparison of HER performance of Co-Mo-B/NF with recent reported electrocatalysts in alkaline seawater.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, because phosphorus (P) has a weaker electronegativity than N, incorporating the secondary heteroatom P would lead to the formation of an unsymmetrical N/P coordination structure, which could undergo a symmetry-breaking charge transfer process and trigger the modulation of the electronic structure of active metal sites. 88 Due to its highest P–C content (Table S5†), the optimized electronic structure of the Fe-Co 2 P@NPDC catalyst enables the metal–N/P active sites to exhibit suitable adsorption/desorption energy barriers for various reaction intermediates (*OOH, *O, and *OH), thus resulting in the promoted electrocatalytic ORR/OER activities (Fig. 5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the tailored electronic structure can endow the asymmetric Co–N 3 P 1 moiety with reduced reaction barriers compared to the common Co–N 4 structure, enabling high ORR performance in an alkaline electrolyte. 18 Thus, introducing heteroatoms can efficiently tune the coordinated micro-environment of single metal active centers, and the electrocatalytic ORR activity can be significantly enhanced. However, rational design of stable and highly efficient nanomaterials with boosted ORR electrochemical activity in a wide pH range still remains a challenge, which severely hinders the practical applications of atomically dispersed metal-based electrocatalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%