2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-4835(03)00171-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Association of clathrin, AP-2 adaptor and actin cytoskeleton with developing interlocking membrane domains of lens fibre cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
37
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
37
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Lens fiber cells have an extensive cortical actin cytoskeleton that is reinforced by actin bundles that are found at vertices of the hexagonal fiber cell (Lo et al, 1997b). Further, membrane protrusions, which increase the membrane surface area between fiber cells, and help to minimize light scatter (Bassnett et al, 2011), are stabilized by an F-actin network within each protrusion (Zhou and Lo, 2003). Thus, the disruption of the normal hexagonal geometry of lens fiber cells (Figure 7 and supplemental figures 3–5) and the loss of membrane protrusions (Figure 3) seen in cKO lens fiber cells is likely directly due to the destabilization of the F-actin cytoskeleton.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lens fiber cells have an extensive cortical actin cytoskeleton that is reinforced by actin bundles that are found at vertices of the hexagonal fiber cell (Lo et al, 1997b). Further, membrane protrusions, which increase the membrane surface area between fiber cells, and help to minimize light scatter (Bassnett et al, 2011), are stabilized by an F-actin network within each protrusion (Zhou and Lo, 2003). Thus, the disruption of the normal hexagonal geometry of lens fiber cells (Figure 7 and supplemental figures 3–5) and the loss of membrane protrusions (Figure 3) seen in cKO lens fiber cells is likely directly due to the destabilization of the F-actin cytoskeleton.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integrity of fiber cells depends on the normal and extensive distributions of its unique interlocking system (Cohen, 1965; Dickson and Crock, 1972; Kuwabara, 1975; Kuszak et al, 1980; Willekens and Vrensen, 1982; Kistler et al, 1986; Zhou and Lo, 2003; Lo et al, 2014) and adherens junctions (Volk and Geiger, 1986; Geiger et al, 1987; Lo, 1988; Atreya et al, 1989; Maisel and Atreya, 1990; Lo et al, 2000; Bagchi et al, 2002; Straub et al, 2003) within the lens. It has been previously suggested that the interlocking protrusions may assist in an overall stability of fiber-cells at the gross level, while adherens junctions maintain localized adhesions in protrusions and between fiber cells at the microscopic level (Lo, 1988; Lo and Reese, 1993; Zhou and Lo, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been previously suggested that the interlocking protrusions may assist in an overall stability of fiber-cells at the gross level, while adherens junctions maintain localized adhesions in protrusions and between fiber cells at the microscopic level (Lo, 1988; Lo and Reese, 1993; Zhou and Lo, 2003). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During lens fiber cell differentiation, these cells develop elaborated lateral membranes that form high surface area interdigitations with their neighbors to allow for extensive cell communication in this avascular tissue (51). Because these interdigitations also are tightly associated with the actin cytoskeleton (52), this association supports a Bin3 connection in actin cytoskeletal dynamics and membrane structure. However, if this is the case, it remains unclear why the lens phenotype should develop so late, only after eye lid opening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%