2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-012-0462-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assimilation of Doppler Weather Radar Radial Velocity and Reflectivity Observations in WRF-3DVAR System for Short-Range Forecasting of Convective Storms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting analysis constitutes the best compromise between the model representation and observations. We selected the three-dimensional variational assimilation (3DVAR) method available for the WRF system (Barker et al, 2004. The aim of variational data assimilation is to find the best least-square fit between a background field x b and observations y o with an iterative minimisation of a cost function J(x) (Ide et al, 1997) JðxÞ ¼ 1…”
Section: Model Setup and Data Assimilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting analysis constitutes the best compromise between the model representation and observations. We selected the three-dimensional variational assimilation (3DVAR) method available for the WRF system (Barker et al, 2004. The aim of variational data assimilation is to find the best least-square fit between a background field x b and observations y o with an iterative minimisation of a cost function J(x) (Ide et al, 1997) JðxÞ ¼ 1…”
Section: Model Setup and Data Assimilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, both the air density and the water vapor content are quite variably, especially on rainy days (Abdalla and Cavaleri, 2002). Therefore, the spatial observation errors in the radial velocity retrievals are unavoidable and might be the main factor that leads to poorer performance of the NWP model than that achieved without data 20 assimilation (Abhilash et al, 2012). Due to the frequent adjustment of the atmospheric motions, decreasing the assimilation time interval may reduce the risk of over correction (Xiao et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, only assimilating radar velocity in Domain 2 or assimilating both types of radar data in Domain 2 made the rainfall forecast unsatisfactory. The observation errors in the radial velocity may have been the main factor that led to the poorest performance (Abhilash et al, 2012). Another reason is that assimilating radial velocity can only change the dynamic field, which changes quickly for small-scale regions, and 6 h may have been too long for the 5 assimilation time interval (Lin et al, 2011).…”
Section: [Table 2]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations