1997
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a032041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Terrestrial Gamma Radiation in Sudan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The knowledge of radionuclides distributions in the sediments acts an essential part in monitoring of environmental contamination and assessment of radiological hazard arising from natural sources. For this purpose, in the recent years many studies give an importance to the measurements of the activity concentrations of natural radionuclides and their hazard on human health [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knowledge of radionuclides distributions in the sediments acts an essential part in monitoring of environmental contamination and assessment of radiological hazard arising from natural sources. For this purpose, in the recent years many studies give an importance to the measurements of the activity concentrations of natural radionuclides and their hazard on human health [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this report, the soil samples in four farms (H1, H3, H4 and H6) showed an absorbed dose rate higher than the world average value. Based on the absorbed dose rate, a conversion coefficient from absorbed dose to effective dose of 0.7 and an outdoor occupancy factor of 0.2 [10,16,17], the annual effective dose was calculated using the formula:…”
Section: Water Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2002) 8 Montenegrin coast (Yugoslavia) 1.5–28.4 Vukotic et al. (1998) 9 Sudan 0–18.5 Sam et al. (1997) 10 North-western Libya 0.9–1.7 Shenber (2001) 11 Riyadh (Saudi Arabia) 0–2 Al-Kahtani et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%