2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.08.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of rock slope stability using GIS-based probabilistic kinematic analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to in-built powerful functions and tools, Geographic Information System (GIS) has been applied more and more widely in landslide hazard assessment [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Some researchers used GIS, incorporating with the mechanical analysis model, to perform regional slope stability analysis [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to in-built powerful functions and tools, Geographic Information System (GIS) has been applied more and more widely in landslide hazard assessment [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Some researchers used GIS, incorporating with the mechanical analysis model, to perform regional slope stability analysis [22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method uses these solutions and accordingly relies on this hypothesis. Although the dip direction and dip angle are dependent for some discontinuities like bedding planes in plunging folds 56 , there are several cases that consider them as independent variables 17 34 35 36 42 43 44 57 58 59 60 . For this reason, it is necessary to check whether the observed orientation sample meets the independence hypothesis before using the proposed method.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been realized later that the combination of different probabilistic methods can yield better assessments, such as the hybrid model of the projection pursuit (PP), particle swarm optimization (PSO), and the logistic curve function (LCF) [21]. The probabilistic methods have also been introduced into different failure criterions and verified against physical models to overcome the limitation of conventional methods without considering randomness and uncertainty of the slope status and mechanical parameters [22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. With the effort for probabilistic sensitivity analysis, more sophisticated models led to improved accuracy of assessment [29]; however, huge challenges remain in the high computational effort, complex modeling procedures, and the large amount of data required to yield results with acceptable accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%