2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.medine.2017.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of right atrial pressure with two-dimensional, Doppler and speckle tracking echocardiography in patients with acute right ventricular myocardial infarction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, several studies involving PH or advanced HF/transplantation populations have compared invasively measured RAP with RV-E/e′ estimated RAP. The results showed a reasonable diagnostic ability of RV-E/e′ for estimating RAP in patients with coronary artery disease and RV systolic dysfunction [34] , [37] , [38] , [39] . The diagnostic ability of RV-E/e′ was generally poor in studies of pediatrics, heart failure and mitral stenosis [35] , [36] , [40] , while the results were equivocal in other diseases [41] .…”
Section: Ra Pressuresmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…In summary, several studies involving PH or advanced HF/transplantation populations have compared invasively measured RAP with RV-E/e′ estimated RAP. The results showed a reasonable diagnostic ability of RV-E/e′ for estimating RAP in patients with coronary artery disease and RV systolic dysfunction [34] , [37] , [38] , [39] . The diagnostic ability of RV-E/e′ was generally poor in studies of pediatrics, heart failure and mitral stenosis [35] , [36] , [40] , while the results were equivocal in other diseases [41] .…”
Section: Ra Pressuresmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The study of acute RV infarction by Ivey-Miranda et al (27) Therefore, the data reviewed does not strongly support the validity of RV-E/e' for assessing RAP in patients with common cardiac diseases or heart failure. However, a commonality of the papers reviewed in this section was the lack of rigorous statistical analysis or inappropriate statistical interpretation.…”
Section: Cardiac Diseases and Heart Failurementioning
confidence: 96%