2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00256-020-03607-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of postoperative acromial and subacromial morphology after arthroscopic acromioplasty using magnetic resonance imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The UCLA shoulder joint scoring system was divided into five aspects, i.e., pain, function, active upper limb anteflexion, upper limb anteflexion muscle strength, and patient satisfaction. The full score was 35 points, and a score less than 27 points indicated that the recovery was not ideal [ 9 ]. Pain conditions: two groups were assessed with visual analogue scales (VAS) before operation, 2 weeks after operation, 2 months after operation, and 6 months after operation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The UCLA shoulder joint scoring system was divided into five aspects, i.e., pain, function, active upper limb anteflexion, upper limb anteflexion muscle strength, and patient satisfaction. The full score was 35 points, and a score less than 27 points indicated that the recovery was not ideal [ 9 ]. Pain conditions: two groups were assessed with visual analogue scales (VAS) before operation, 2 weeks after operation, 2 months after operation, and 6 months after operation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UCLA shoulder joint scoring system was divided into five aspects, i.e., pain, function, active upper limb anteflexion, upper limb anteflexion muscle strength, and patient satisfaction. The full score was 35 points, and a score less than 27 points indicated that the recovery was not ideal [ 9 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a comparison of the long-term clinical outcomes in patients treated with RC repair and those who underwent RC repair along with subacromial decompression showed no additional benefits [ 16 ]. Kang [ 17 ] also reported that a delayed reduction in acromial thickness is a normal postoperative feature one year after arthroscopic acromioplasty, and that an exaggerated concave contour of the acromial undersurface is also observed in some patients, which is considered a new risk factor for RC tears. Lähdeoja [ 18 ] reported that spur size did not correlate significantly with shoulder function or pain, which was proposed based on findings that subacromial decompression had no benefit in terms of functional outcome or pain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%