2016
DOI: 10.5194/amt-9-4935-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of lidar depolarization uncertainty by means of a polarimetric lidar simulator

Abstract: Abstract. Lidar depolarization measurements distinguish between spherical and non-spherical aerosol particles based on the change of the polarization state between the emitted and received signal. The particle shape information in combination with other aerosol optical properties allows the characterization of different aerosol types and the retrieval of aerosol particle microphysical properties. Regarding the microphysical inversions, the lidar depolarization technique is becoming a key method since particle … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar characterizations of different EARLINET lidars have been reported by Bravo-Aranda et al (2016). The results are shown for the conditions during SALTRACE-3 as it was characterized when the system was back in Leipzig.…”
Section: A2 System Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar characterizations of different EARLINET lidars have been reported by Bravo-Aranda et al (2016). The results are shown for the conditions during SALTRACE-3 as it was characterized when the system was back in Leipzig.…”
Section: A2 System Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…other EARLINET lidars by Bravo-Aranda et al (2016). An appropriate assumption for the rotational misalignment β is 0 • ± 1.0 • .…”
Section: A2 System Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Uncertainties in the basic lidar-derived optical properties and the POLIPHON retrieval products are extensively analyzed and discussed by Freudenthaler et al (2009, , Mamouri and Ansmann (2014, 2016), and Bravo-Aranda et al (2016 and will not be discussed here. Typical uncertainties in the basic particle optical properties are given in Table 4 for 532 nm.…”
Section: Retrieval Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adachi et al, 2001, requiring additionally a total backscattering ratio measurement). Bravo-Aranda et al (2016) and Freudenthaler (2016) analyze the effects of transmitter-receiver angular misalignment on uncertainties in the retrieved atmospheric depolarization values. The calculations therein are less relevant for CRL because both studies include the error that is induced by leaving an extra compensation optic in the lidar (the half-waveplate).…”
Section: Literature Review Of Depolarization Calibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%