2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-013-1844-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Lead Contamination in Peatlands Using Field Portable XRF

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Peat is organic sediment formed by the decomposition of plant residues in wet and acidic conditions. Studies have shown that peat soils close to urban and industrial areas can be enriched by TEs through atmospheric deposition (Shuttleworth et al, 2014); in addition, the metal complexation capacity of organic matter makes peat an important Pb scavenger (Farmer et al, 2005;Hosseinpur and Motaghian, 2015). There have been no studies in Brazil that quantify the levels of TEs in the peat used for organic-mineral fertilizers; however, data from the international literature have shown that high concentrations of trace elements, especially Pb, can be found in peat (Mighall et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peat is organic sediment formed by the decomposition of plant residues in wet and acidic conditions. Studies have shown that peat soils close to urban and industrial areas can be enriched by TEs through atmospheric deposition (Shuttleworth et al, 2014); in addition, the metal complexation capacity of organic matter makes peat an important Pb scavenger (Farmer et al, 2005;Hosseinpur and Motaghian, 2015). There have been no studies in Brazil that quantify the levels of TEs in the peat used for organic-mineral fertilizers; however, data from the international literature have shown that high concentrations of trace elements, especially Pb, can be found in peat (Mighall et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These novel mobile equipment offer a plethora of advantages to the analyst such as real time and onsite determinations of organic and inorganic analytes in a myriad of sample matrices. [13][14][15] In case of the use of portable LIBS and EDXRF systems, the most common in situ applications involve the determination of potentially toxic metals in soil, [16][17][18][19] and analysis of samples as diverse as those of industrial, geological, archaeological and of cultural heritage interest. 18,[20][21][22][23][24][25] The appropriate analytical performance exhibited by commercially available portable XRF instruments have been recently demonstrated elsewhere 5,26 and certainly contributed to spark the interest of researchers in the proposition of in situ methods using such a mobile instrumentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fe, Cu, Mn, Pb, Rb, Sr, and Zn showed the lowest σ values (ranging from 0.87 to 0.99), and Ba, Cr, and Sn the highest values (1.41, 1.28 and 1.03, respectively). Shuttleworth et al (2014) assessed Pb in contaminated Histosols, comparing acid digestion method (US EPA 3051a) followed by inductively couple plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) to pXRF analysis (in-situ and ex-situ). The authors found a significant difference between wet and dry samples on their results.…”
Section: Effect Of Water Content On Elemental Concentration Obtained mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elements with atomic number (Z) < 26 seem to be more influenced (Ge et al, 2005;Weindorf et al, 2014). However, Zr (Z = 40) and Pb (Z = 82) were also influenced by water content (Hürkamp et al, 2009;Shuttleworth et al, 2014;Hangen;Vieten, 2016). In some Brazilian soil samples the elements Si (Z = 14) and Al (Z = 13) were much more influenced by moisture than Ti (Z = 22) and Fe (Z = 26) (Ribeiro et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%