2012
DOI: 10.1007/s40003-012-0045-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Genetic Diversity in Sweet Orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] Cultivars of India Using Morphological and RAPD Markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
3
17
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of morphological and molecular outcomes is a key factor to conclude the extent of genetic diversity present in the set of cultivars (Sharma et al 2015). In our study, there was positive and significant correlation between both morphological and ISSR markers (r=0.739 ** ), which were in agreement with the findings on sweet orange cultivars (Malik et al 2012) and lime accessions (JahangirzadehKhiavi et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Comparison of morphological and molecular outcomes is a key factor to conclude the extent of genetic diversity present in the set of cultivars (Sharma et al 2015). In our study, there was positive and significant correlation between both morphological and ISSR markers (r=0.739 ** ), which were in agreement with the findings on sweet orange cultivars (Malik et al 2012) and lime accessions (JahangirzadehKhiavi et al 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Sweet Navel orange cultivars may be very closely related, as shown by a study in India where the genetic diversity of 22 different cultivars of C. sinensis was assessed and found to be very low, despite being highly diverse in morphology (Malik et al. ). It is possible that the difference in the attractiveness of the fruit is not substantial enough to show any statistical differences in oviposition preference when female moths were allowed a choice, but may have influenced females when no varietal choice was allowed, as was seen in the no‐choice trials where Cara Cara Navels were less preferred for oviposition than Washington and Bahianinha Navels in the mid‐maturity grouping or where Lane Late Navels were less preferred than Powell Summer, Cambria and Glen Ora Late Navel in the late maturity grouping.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The variability in these properties of the fruit can be seen in the differences in internal quality and the highly diverse morphology found by Malik et al. ().…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Untuk keperluan konservasi dan pengembangan varietas, identitas varietas yang akurat menjadi penting. Berbagai metode karakterisasi jeruk telah banyak dikembangkan, yaitu berdasarkan karakter morfologis (Koehler-Santos et al, 2003;Penjor et al, 2014), biokimia (Gorinstein et al, 2001;Yuan-Chuen et al, 2007), dan genetik Biswas et al, 2011;Malik et al, 2012;Rao et al, 2008).…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified