2008
DOI: 10.3133/fs20083073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of gas hydrate resources on the North Slope, Alaska, 2008

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is estimated that 2.4 TCM of undiscovered, technically recoverable gas hydrate resources exist in the region [191]. In collaboration with BP Exploration (Alaska) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) drilled a stratigraphic test well in 2007 to assess the potential of hydrates on the North Slope to become technically and commercially viable gas resource.…”
Section: Mount Elbert Well -Alaskamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is estimated that 2.4 TCM of undiscovered, technically recoverable gas hydrate resources exist in the region [191]. In collaboration with BP Exploration (Alaska) and the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) drilled a stratigraphic test well in 2007 to assess the potential of hydrates on the North Slope to become technically and commercially viable gas resource.…”
Section: Mount Elbert Well -Alaskamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of new quan ta ve es mates of in-place methane hydrate volumes (Klauda and Sandler, 2005;Frye, 2008;Wood and Jung, 2008;Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, 2012) and, for the fi rst me, technical recoverable Fujii et al, 2008) assessments, have been undertaken using petroleum systems concepts developed for conven onal oil and natural gas explora on. For example, in an assessment of methane hydrate resources on the North Slope of Alaska, Colle et al (2008) indicated that there are about 2.42 trillion cubic meters (~85.4 trillion cubic feet) of technically recoverable methane resources within concentrated, sand-dominated, methane hydrate accumula ons in northern Alaska.…”
Section: Methane Hydrate Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various opera onal groups (reviewed by Colle and Dallimore, 2002) have reported drilling hazards a ributed to the presence of methane hydrate (Figure 13). However, a longer-term and perhaps more diffi cult to constrain risk is the poten al for hydrate dissocia on and sedimentwellbore instability caused by the hea ng of sediment around produc on wells due to sustained fl ow of deeper, warmer fl uids.…”
Section: Casedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional early expeditions included ODP legs 164 (Paull et al, 1996) and 204 (Tréhu et al, 2004), IODP Expedition 311 (Riedel et al, 2006a), as well as the 1998 and 2005 drilling programs conducted in the Nankai trough by the MH21 consortium (Tsujii et al, 2009;. More recently, GH drilling projects such as the Gumusut-Kakap project offshore Malaysia (Hadley et al, 2008), the DOEsponsored drilling Legs I and II under the Joint-Industry Project in the Gulf of Mexico , and the India NGHP Expedition 01 (Collett et al, 2008b(Collett et al, , 2008c(Collett et al, , 2008d, as well as those in the offshore of China (Yang et al, 2008) and South Korea (Park et al, 2008) have continued to expand the GH knowledge base.…”
Section: Gas Hydrate Prospecting and Geologic Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%