2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2005.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of dose rates around Manisa (Turkey)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
20
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
9
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The gamma dose rates recorded indoors were 35% higher than in the outdoor environs. The range of indoor gamma dose rates obtained in the present study in Kotli was similar to the 113.1 to 243.6 nGy.h -1 for Manisa, Turkey (Erees et al,2005) and lies towards the higher side compared with studies reported for the Kastamonu region, Nothern Turkey (44.9 to 68.5 nGy.h -1 , Kam and Bozkurt, 2007) and Tekirdag, Turkey (30.5 to 68.6 nGy.h -1 , Yarar and Kam, 2005). However, the indoor gamma dose rate range of (104 to 165) nGy.h -1 in the Kotli area is appreciably higher than the world estimates for the population-weighted average range of 18 to 93 nGy.h -1 , UNSCEAR (2000).…”
Section: Gamma Dose Ratessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The gamma dose rates recorded indoors were 35% higher than in the outdoor environs. The range of indoor gamma dose rates obtained in the present study in Kotli was similar to the 113.1 to 243.6 nGy.h -1 for Manisa, Turkey (Erees et al,2005) and lies towards the higher side compared with studies reported for the Kastamonu region, Nothern Turkey (44.9 to 68.5 nGy.h -1 , Kam and Bozkurt, 2007) and Tekirdag, Turkey (30.5 to 68.6 nGy.h -1 , Yarar and Kam, 2005). However, the indoor gamma dose rate range of (104 to 165) nGy.h -1 in the Kotli area is appreciably higher than the world estimates for the population-weighted average range of 18 to 93 nGy.h -1 , UNSCEAR (2000).…”
Section: Gamma Dose Ratessupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In order to evaluate the radioactivity levels in water, a total of eight drinking water samples 49.2 (13-221) 1.24 (0.33-5.57) Istanbul (Koksal et al 2004) 10-260 0.5-13 Izmir (Erees and Yener 1999) 53-86 2.65-4.3 Kastamonu 98.4 (29-177) 2.48 (0.73-4.46) Manisa (Erees et al 2006) 97 (47-146) 4.86 (2.35-7.3) Tekirdag (Yarar and Kam 2005) 8 7 2 . 0 1 World (Thorne 2003) 3 9 1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in Lahore, Pakistan, at lower altitude (800 feet), the average gamma dose rate has been reported as 65 nGy/h (Akhtar et al, 2005). The outdoor gamma dose rates in Turkey (Erees et al, 2006) and Japan (Chikasawa et al, 2001) have been reported to range from 78.3 nGy/h to 135.7 nGy/h and 13.8 nGy/h to 187 nGy/h, respectively. The 69.6 ± 2.2 nGy/h to 113.1 ± 2.4 nGy/h gamma dose rate in the area is within the gamma dose rates of the above-mentioned countries.…”
Section: Number Of Dwellingsmentioning
confidence: 99%