2008
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.144.3.413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Delayed Reporting of Mycosis Fungoides and Sézary Syndrome in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of CTCL, however, for diagnoses made between 1975 and 1994, there was minimal if any reporting delay overall. 13 While we do not have specific evidence on delayed reporting since that time, this finding makes it unlikely that delayed reporting played a primary role in our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…In the case of CTCL, however, for diagnoses made between 1975 and 1994, there was minimal if any reporting delay overall. 13 While we do not have specific evidence on delayed reporting since that time, this finding makes it unlikely that delayed reporting played a primary role in our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…[5] Dores et al reported a 6% increase in submissions for MF/SS from 1990 to 1994. [47] We compared the age-adjusted incidence rates for CTCL and its subtypes diagnosed from 2005-2008 one year after it was initially reported, and found a 2.9% increase in rates of MF, 14.3% increase in SS, 1.9% increase in CD30 + LPD and 1.8% increase in pcTCL; however J U S T A C C E P T E D no increase in SPTCL incidence rates. The 14.3% rate increase in SS likely is due to the small number of initial cases resulting in a large percentage increase, and this reflects the difficulties associated with reporting incidence on rare cancers.…”
Section: J U S T a C C E P T E Dmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The SEER registries minimize biases introduced by missing data by rigorous evaluation for data quality and completeness, resulting in case ascertainment ≥98% of cases across all SEER registries. [46] As discussed in previous SEER studies, [5,47] delayed reporting can have an impact on incidence on the most recent 1-3 years of incidence data, and is especially true for those cancers that are diagnosed as outpatient. [48] Recently, SEER introduced the Cancer Query Systems (CanQues) application that provides delay-adjusted incidence rates.…”
Section: J U S T a C C E P T E Dmentioning
confidence: 99%