2009
DOI: 10.1175/2009jtecha1246.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Cloudsat Reflectivity Measurements and Ice Cloud Properties Using Ground-Based and Airborne Cloud Radar Observations

Abstract: International audienceA quantitative assessment of Cloudsat reflectivities and basic ice cloud properties (cloud base, top, and thickness) is conducted in the present study from both airborne and ground-based observations. Airborne observations allow direct comparisons on a limited number of ocean backscatter and cloud samples, whereas the ground-based observations allow statistical comparisons on much longer time series but with some additional assumptions. Direct comparisons of the ocean backscatter and ice … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
103
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
(54 reference statements)
6
103
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on previous modeling studies [Lynn et al, 2005;Khain et al, 2005;van den Heever et al, 2006van den Heever et al, , 2011Rosenfeld et al, 2008;Storer et al, 2010;Storer and van den Heever, 2013;Fan et al, 2013], we would expect an increase in cloud ice with increased aerosol amounts. However, there is some uncertainty associated with the values of ice water path due to the fact that radar-based retrievals of ice water content are sensitive to the choice of the size and density parameters used [Protat et al, 2009]. Changes in aerosol concentration can also affect the size of ice particles, and so competing effects may be leading to the lack of a consistent trend.…”
Section: Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous modeling studies [Lynn et al, 2005;Khain et al, 2005;van den Heever et al, 2006van den Heever et al, , 2011Rosenfeld et al, 2008;Storer et al, 2010;Storer and van den Heever, 2013;Fan et al, 2013], we would expect an increase in cloud ice with increased aerosol amounts. However, there is some uncertainty associated with the values of ice water path due to the fact that radar-based retrievals of ice water content are sensitive to the choice of the size and density parameters used [Protat et al, 2009]. Changes in aerosol concentration can also affect the size of ice particles, and so competing effects may be leading to the lack of a consistent trend.…”
Section: Shown Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CloudSat IWC has been validated with in situ, groundbased and other satellite IWC measurements (e.g., Austin et al, 2009;Wu et al, 2009;Protat et al, 2009). The uncertainty is claimed to be up to 40 % , which is much smaller than the divergences among various satellites and models, the latter of which often exceed 100 % Eliasson et al, 2011).…”
Section: Cloudsat Iwcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CloudSat IWC product from 2B-CWC-RO V008 has a vertical resolution of ∼ 0.25 km and horizontal resolution of ∼ 1.1 km. Despite having been validated against aircraft measurements and many other independent observations (Protat et al, 2009;Wu et al, 2009), the CloudSat IWC product still has some known issues. Thin cirrus clouds are normally below its detection threshold, and the W-band radar tends to suffer from attenuation and/or multiple-scattering below 9 km when clouds are heavily precipitating (Protat et al, 2009).…”
Section: Data Sets Model and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite having been validated against aircraft measurements and many other independent observations (Protat et al, 2009;Wu et al, 2009), the CloudSat IWC product still has some known issues. Thin cirrus clouds are normally below its detection threshold, and the W-band radar tends to suffer from attenuation and/or multiple-scattering below 9 km when clouds are heavily precipitating (Protat et al, 2009). Austin et al (2009) estimated this IWC product uncertainty of up to ∼ 40 %, while Eliasson et al (2013) pointed out that the error could be much larger in mixed-phase clouds as well as in thin ice cloud.…”
Section: Data Sets Model and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation