2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2006.10.404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of burn depth: A prospective, blinded comparison of laser Doppler imaging and videomicroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
77
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
77
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Video microscopy was assessed by McGill et al [66] on patients admitted within 72 h after burn. Microvascular features were observed: ''intact or nearly intact dermal vasculature, progressing through to large amounts of capillary destruction and haemoglobin deposition in deep partial thickness injuries and complete destruction in full thickness injuries''.…”
Section: Optical Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Video microscopy was assessed by McGill et al [66] on patients admitted within 72 h after burn. Microvascular features were observed: ''intact or nearly intact dermal vasculature, progressing through to large amounts of capillary destruction and haemoglobin deposition in deep partial thickness injuries and complete destruction in full thickness injuries''.…”
Section: Optical Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While superficial and full-thickness burns types are relatively straightforward for clinicians to diagnose based on appearance, it is more difficult to categorize partial thickness burns (second-degree) that can fall in between the superficial or deep category. The accuracy of diagnosing these partial thickness burns by clinicians is typically 60-80% when the diagnosis is done several days after the burn injury [2][3][4]. However, when clinicians attempt to make the diagnosis within the first 24-48 hours of the occurrence of a burn, the accuracy of the diagnosis decreases to 50% [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LDI allows a clinician to visualize the spatial variation of perfusion, a key indicator of burn depths and eventual healing times. One of the issues associated with LDI, however, is that the analysis often measures relatively superficial blood flow, when quantitative, deeper analysis would be more informative to burn management, particularly with respect to differentiating superficial partial thickness burns from deep partial thickness burns [2,3]. In addition, for many of the LDI systems that are currently available, the laser is mechanically scanned over the patient for up to 5 minutes per image, resulting in movement artifacts and long data collection times for large surface area burns [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations