2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2015.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of artificial neural network and genetic programming as predictive tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
125
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 306 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since R value does not change by equal shifting of the output values predicted by a model, it is acknowledged not to be a good indicator on its own for evaluating the accuracy of a model on its own. On the other hand, besides assuming the impact of various data divisions for the learning and validation data, the performance index ( ρ ) simultaneously takes into account the changes of RRMSE and R. Lower RRMSE and higher R values yield in lower OBJ indicating a more accurate model (Gandomi, Roke 2015). The values obtained for R, RRMSE, and ρ are respectively, 0.8467, 0.4065, and 0.220.…”
Section: Nomentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since R value does not change by equal shifting of the output values predicted by a model, it is acknowledged not to be a good indicator on its own for evaluating the accuracy of a model on its own. On the other hand, besides assuming the impact of various data divisions for the learning and validation data, the performance index ( ρ ) simultaneously takes into account the changes of RRMSE and R. Lower RRMSE and higher R values yield in lower OBJ indicating a more accurate model (Gandomi, Roke 2015). The values obtained for R, RRMSE, and ρ are respectively, 0.8467, 0.4065, and 0.220.…”
Section: Nomentioning
confidence: 96%
“…GP is intrinsically capable of finding the best solution by evaluating fitness of the computer programs over numerous generations; on the contrary, as mentioned earlier, in ANN, data should be normalized at the outset, and best network architecture first should be established (Gandomi, Roke 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ANNs are generally successful in prediction, they are only appropriate to use as part of a computer program, not for the development of practical prediction equations. In addition, ANN requires data to be initially normalized based on the suitable activation function and the best network architecture to be determined by the user, and it can have a complex structure and a high potential for over-fitting [10]. SVMs, on the other hand, are one of the efficient kernel-based methods that can solve a convex constrained quadratic programming (CCQP) problem to find a set of parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Peng et al (2014) proposed an improved GEP algorithm especially suitable for dealing with SR problems. Gandomi and Roke (2015) compared the forecasting performance of artificial neural network models to that of GEP techniques.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%