2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment and comparison of different methods for heartbeat classification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The processing of the information by the heart is reflected in dynamical changes of electrical activity in time, frequency and space. Mostly, features in time [7] and frequency [8] were extracted and combined with efficient classifiers.…”
Section: Morphological-based Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The processing of the information by the heart is reflected in dynamical changes of electrical activity in time, frequency and space. Mostly, features in time [7] and frequency [8] were extracted and combined with efficient classifiers.…”
Section: Morphological-based Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are various mechanism to extract ECG features, such as morphological characteristic like amplitude [12] and Hermite based function [13]. There is also study by Sani et al in sleep apnea detection from ECG signal on its optimal features, principal components, and nonlinearity [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus far, simple classifiers, such as linear discriminants [3] and K-nearest neighbor classifier [4], and complex classifiers, including chaotic modeling, spectral coherence analysis, artificial neural networks, and support vector machine, have been extensively applied. Classifier combination is also used in ECG heartbeat classification to improve accuracy [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%