2009
DOI: 10.1080/13674670802651487
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing “Western” Mindfulness Among Thai Theravāda Buddhist Monks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The scale exhibits good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.82–0.87) and high test–retest reliability over a 1-month period (intraclass correlation=0.81, p <0.0001) [20, 50]. The MAAS score has been shown to be positively related to long-term meditation experience, where Zen meditators were shown to have higher MAAS scores than age-and sex-matched community members [20], and Thai monks showed higher MAAS scores than Thai or American students [51]. A systematic review and meta-analysis showed randomized controlled trials that evaluate impacts of mindfulness training on self-reported mindfulness scores, including the MAAS, show overall improvements in self-reported mindfulness in relation to wait-list control groups, but not in relation to active control groups [48], which is somewhat concerning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scale exhibits good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α=0.82–0.87) and high test–retest reliability over a 1-month period (intraclass correlation=0.81, p <0.0001) [20, 50]. The MAAS score has been shown to be positively related to long-term meditation experience, where Zen meditators were shown to have higher MAAS scores than age-and sex-matched community members [20], and Thai monks showed higher MAAS scores than Thai or American students [51]. A systematic review and meta-analysis showed randomized controlled trials that evaluate impacts of mindfulness training on self-reported mindfulness scores, including the MAAS, show overall improvements in self-reported mindfulness in relation to wait-list control groups, but not in relation to active control groups [48], which is somewhat concerning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 A systematic review and meta-analysis showed randomized controlled trials that evaluate impacts of mindfulness training on self-reported mindfulness scores, including the MAAS, exhibit overall improvements in self-reported mindfulness in relation to wait-list control groups, but not in relation to active control groups. 7 The convergent and discriminant validity of the MAAS has been evaluated, and it appears to measure a distinct construct where higher scorers on the MAAS tend to be more aware of and receptive to inner experiences and are more mindful of their overt behavior.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A mean score is calculated (range 1.00–6.00), where higher scores reflect greater self-reported attention and awareness, or “dispositional mindfulness.” The scale exhibits good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α =0.82–0.87) and high test-retest reliability over a 1-month period (intraclass correlatio n =0.81, p <0.0001) [21, 32]. The MAAS score has been shown to be positively related to long-term meditation experience, where Zen meditators were shown to have higher MAAS scores than age- and sex-matched community members [21], and Thai monks showed higher MAAS scores than Thai or American students [33]. A systematic review and meta-analysis showed randomized controlled trials that evaluate impacts of mindfulness training on self-reported mindfulness scores, including the MAAS, show overall improvements in self-reported mindfulness in relation to wait-list control groups, but not in relation to active control groups [34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%