2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2010.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the utility of airborne hyperspectral and LiDAR data for species distribution mapping in the coastal Pacific Northwest, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
129
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
9
129
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…McNemar's test has been frequently used for testing the statistical significance of two classifiers [4,20,21,50]. Foody [51] suggests the use of McNemar's test instead of a z-test in cases where the same test samples are used for each accuracy assessment, resulting in the assumption of independence of Figure 4.…”
Section: Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…McNemar's test has been frequently used for testing the statistical significance of two classifiers [4,20,21,50]. Foody [51] suggests the use of McNemar's test instead of a z-test in cases where the same test samples are used for each accuracy assessment, resulting in the assumption of independence of Figure 4.…”
Section: Accuracy Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVM classifier produced more reasonable classification map although it did not obtain the highest classification accuracy in most of the classification runs. Previous researches also suggested that SVM classifier outperformed conventional approaches to classify high-dimensional and multi-source data in complex environments (Jones, Coops, & Sharma, 2010). Due to non-linear and adaptive fitting capacities of RBF kernel, SVM was powerful to cope with high dimension data (Verrelst et al, 2015).…”
Section: Classifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SVM separates the classes with a decision surface that maximizes the margin between the classes. SVM was reported to outperform when cope with high dimension, limited samples and multi-source data representing complex environments (Jones, Coops, & Sharma, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buckley et al (2013) combined hyperspectral and LiDAR data for geological out crop analysis, floodplain classification (Verrelst et al, 2009) and civil engineering structural monitoring (Brook et al, 2010). Most of the other work on LiDAR and imaging spectroscopy data fusion (Colgan et al, 2012;Dalponte et al, 2012;Ghosh et al, 2013;Jones et al, 2010); focus on vegetation applications. The growing interest in urban precise engineering mapping, deformation monitoring and the critical time factor involved in selecting training sites for supervised classification, especially for large areas or during emergency situations, motivates this study.…”
Section: Ajasmentioning
confidence: 99%