Global Pesticide Resistance in Arthropods 2008
DOI: 10.1079/9781845933531.0090
View full text |Buy / Rent full text
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: This chapter discusses the principal features governing the evolution of pesticide resistance, including mutation, gene flow, initial gene frequency, fitness, genetic drift in arthropod resistance and selection intensity, while discussing spatially complex models and their role in pest management practices.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation approach taken here was similar to that used to develop guidelines for managing the evolution of resistance to insecticides by insects (9,23,28,36,44,45,54,55) and discussed further by Peck (35). This approach entails simulating the management strategy under a wide range of conditions to identify the region of parameter space associated with effective disease control.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some models use a generational time-step, others use a daily time-step, e.g., Crowder and Onstad [ 17 ], Crowder et al [ 28 ]. Some models are spatially explicit, that is there is a specific ordering and structure to patches (fields) so some patches are closer while others are more distant (concepts of distance, dispersal kernels and spread become important) [ 14 , 16 , 19 , 29 , 30 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. Other models are spatially implicit and model populations with no spatial structure and movement is represented as an exchange of individuals between these populations without regards to distance [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 ].…”
Section: Fundamental Models Of Diabrotica Virgifera Virgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crava et al (2013) complementan este concepto refiriendo a la tolerancia como una medida cuantitativa de la resistencia que está distribuida entre los individuos de una población. Al definir a la resistencia como un carácter heredable, cabe considerar el genotipo que lo determina y su frecuencia en la población, la que frente a la presión de selección que ejerce el insecticida, crecerá en el tiempo (Caprio et al, 2008). La resistencia de campo a una toxina Bt (field-evolved resistance en la literatura internacional vigente) es la menor susceptibilidad de una población de insectos como consecuencia de la exposición a esa toxina a campo, en relación a la línea base de susceptibilidad, a su vez definida como la CL 50 (concentración de una toxina que provoca la muerte del 50% de la población) de la toxina Bt en poblaciones de diferentes regiones previa a la introducción de la toxina (por ejemplo, Bernardi et al, 2012).…”
Section: La Resistenciaunclassified
“…IRM models range from simple deterministic population genetic models that include only a few parameters to much more complex stochastic models that represent interrelated complex process and incorporate potentially hundreds of parameters (see reviews Caprio et al 2008 ;Onstad 2008 ) . As described by Peck ( 2000 ) and later echoed in Matten and Reynolds ( 2003 ) , deterministic modeling, under discrete, nonrandom conditions, examines resistance evolution within a single fi eld of Bt PIP crop to several thousand fi elds.…”
Section: Types Of Irm Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors have described important environmental and economic bene fi ts, which have resulted from the use of Bt PIP crops, e.g ., reduction in exposure to conventional pesticides as a result of lowered conventional pesticide use, reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, mycotoxin reduction in Bt PIP corn, and yield increases (USEPA 2001 ;Glaser and Matten 2003 ;Carpenter et al 2002 ;Cattaneo et al 2006 ;Fernandez-Cornejo and Caswell 2006 ;Wu 2006 ) . Many authors have described important environmental and economic bene fi ts, which have resulted from the use of Bt PIP crops, e.g ., reduction in exposure to conventional pesticides as a result of lowered conventional pesticide use, reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, mycotoxin reduction in Bt PIP corn, and yield increases (USEPA 2001 ;Glaser and Matten 2003 ;Carpenter et al 2002 ;Cattaneo et al 2006 ;Fernandez-Cornejo and Caswell 2006 ;Wu 2006 ) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%