2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12955-018-0858-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the reliability of the short form 12 (SF-12) health survey in adults with mental health conditions: a report from the wellness incentive and navigation (WIN) study

Abstract: BackgroundAlthough Short Form (SF)-12 × 2® has been extensively studied and used as a valid measure of health-related quality of life in a variety of population groups, no systematic studies have described the reliability of the measure in patients with behavioral conditions or serious mental illness (SMI).Methods and resultsWe assessed the internal consistency, split-half reliability and annual test-retest correlations in a sample of 1587 participants with either a combination of physical and behavioral condi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
102
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
102
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The SF‐12 physical health and mental health composite scores assess how physical health (e.g., pain) and affective symptoms (e.g., feeling depressed or anxious) have influenced functioning in daily life, respectively. The SF‐12 has been shown to have good internal consistency (e.g., Huo et al, 2018), and in COMBINE, the SF‐12 had an internal consistency reliability of α = 0.91. The World Health Organization Quality‐of‐Life Scale‐BREF (WHOQOL‐BREF; WHOQOL Group, 1998) was used to assess participants’ perceived quality of life in the past 4 weeks in physical health, psychological, social, and environmental (e.g., home environment, finances, safe/security) domains of functioning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SF‐12 physical health and mental health composite scores assess how physical health (e.g., pain) and affective symptoms (e.g., feeling depressed or anxious) have influenced functioning in daily life, respectively. The SF‐12 has been shown to have good internal consistency (e.g., Huo et al, 2018), and in COMBINE, the SF‐12 had an internal consistency reliability of α = 0.91. The World Health Organization Quality‐of‐Life Scale‐BREF (WHOQOL‐BREF; WHOQOL Group, 1998) was used to assess participants’ perceived quality of life in the past 4 weeks in physical health, psychological, social, and environmental (e.g., home environment, finances, safe/security) domains of functioning.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Short Form (SF)-12 is derived from the SF-36 instrument that is designed to measure generic quality of life [30]. The SF-12 has been validated across a number of chronic conditions and populations, including people with mental conditions and in Asian settings [31][32][33]. It generates scores across eight domains of health: physical function (PF), role-physical (RP), bodily pain (BP), general health (GH), vitality (VT), social function (SF), roleemotion (RE), and mental health (MH) which are then used to generate two summary scores -physical component summary (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS).…”
Section: Quality Of Lifementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. The SF-12 has demonstrated reliability among populations with mental illness and co-occurring medical conditions [41], as well as validity among those who have experienced both homelessness and mental illness [42].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%