2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the public transport travel behavior consistency from smart card data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our case, as all the vertices in a clique are connected by edges, it can be argued that the clustering coefficients of the vertices in the polishing graph increase on average when the clique is generated. The cluster coefficient of vertex, i,, is defined by (4), where e i denotes the number of edges connecting the neighborhoods of vertex i and k i denotes the number of vertices adjacent to i.…”
Section: The Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our case, as all the vertices in a clique are connected by edges, it can be argued that the clustering coefficients of the vertices in the polishing graph increase on average when the clique is generated. The cluster coefficient of vertex, i,, is defined by (4), where e i denotes the number of edges connecting the neighborhoods of vertex i and k i denotes the number of vertices adjacent to i.…”
Section: The Thresholdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies questioned if one day observation records would be sufficient to build mobility models. "In this context, Huff and Hanson (1986) [1] discussed the relation between regularity and variability in human mobility behavior and define some metrics to measure both phenomena. In their research, they observed high regularity around few places (home, work and shopping), but also a high travel variability between each day.…”
Section: Need/background Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the advent of smart card data, public transport authorities can now have access to a better view of the use of their service [1]. As the card is linked with information provided by the users, it gives a better idea of the socioeconomic and demographic profile of the users.…”
Section: Data Recordedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first refers to users’ tendency to board a given station for their trips, while the later refers to users’ tendency to travel at a particular hour of the day i.e., trip frequency [ 41 ]. Espinoza et al [ 42 ] measured PT users’ behavior change in travel over time by splitting data into different time windows using three algorithms (Transition Probability Matrix (TPM), Spatiotemporal Edit Distance Method (EDM) and Regions of Interest and Feature Vector (RoIs-FV)). It was found that the results obtained for the same users can be different using different algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%