2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.sempedsurg.2020.150995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the previously repaired patient with an anorectal malformation who is not doing well

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evaluation of an ARM patient who is not doing well postrepair starts with obtaining a detailed history including symptoms, current and past medical therapies, and surgical interventions. 8 This patient was referred for anal stricture, which occurs in 20 to 30% of ARMs. 9 A review of 95 redo operations in cloaca by this paper's senior author showed that the most common indication for revision was a persistent urogenital sinus in which the rectal component only was repaired (46), followed by a rectal stricture or atresia (45), acquired vaginal stricture or atresia (45) mislocated rectum (36), urethrovaginal fistula (16), rectal prolapse (12), urethral atresia or stricture (7), and rectovaginal fistula (5), with most patients having greater than one indication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evaluation of an ARM patient who is not doing well postrepair starts with obtaining a detailed history including symptoms, current and past medical therapies, and surgical interventions. 8 This patient was referred for anal stricture, which occurs in 20 to 30% of ARMs. 9 A review of 95 redo operations in cloaca by this paper's senior author showed that the most common indication for revision was a persistent urogenital sinus in which the rectal component only was repaired (46), followed by a rectal stricture or atresia (45), acquired vaginal stricture or atresia (45) mislocated rectum (36), urethrovaginal fistula (16), rectal prolapse (12), urethral atresia or stricture (7), and rectovaginal fistula (5), with most patients having greater than one indication.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 10 of the 35 children in this review, their ARM type was not documented; the presence of spinal anomalies not reported in 23; and the primary operative repair unknown for the majority (33 children, 95%). Accurate understanding of ARM type is essential not only to facilitate precise operative repair, but also to prognosticate continence potential 7,10 . The ARM Index may be used to predict continence in patients with an ARM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fecal incontinence following ARM repair is commonly considered to result from either severe constipation with overflow soiling, or "true" incontinence, when the patient's anatomic features are considered insufficient to support fecal control. 7,24 Heikenen et al 16 focused on colonic motility in children with fecal incontinence refractory to medical management following ARM repair. High-amplitude propagated contractions were identified in all subjects, 81% of which propagated to the neorectum.…”
Section: Colonic Manometry Outcomes In Relation To Bowel Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Patients were selected for the TH visit option based on the following inclusion criteria: previously established with the Comprehensive Colorectal Center, anatomy previously delineated on IP evaluation (examination under anesthesia with imaging), and those without acute issues that might require inpatient admission. 17,18 Patients who required initial evaluation or those with acute issues requiring IP examination were not offered a TH visit. If imaging or laboratory studies were required, these were performed at nearby facilities on the days before the TH appointments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%