Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
1
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
6
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings add to the mixed results found in other aquatic (riverine, marine, and wetland) PA evaluations: no difference in richness (Chessman ; Penha et al. ); significantly higher richness inside PAs (Abraham & Kelkar ; Sarkar et al. ); and lower richness inside PAs (Monaco et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These findings add to the mixed results found in other aquatic (riverine, marine, and wetland) PA evaluations: no difference in richness (Chessman ; Penha et al. ); significantly higher richness inside PAs (Abraham & Kelkar ; Sarkar et al. ); and lower richness inside PAs (Monaco et al.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…However, species richness and Shannon diversity values were not significantly different. These findings add to the mixed results found in other aquatic (riverine, marine, and wetland) PA evaluations: no difference in richness (Chessman 2013;Penha et al 2014); significantly higher richness inside PAs (Abraham & Kelkar 2012;Sarkar et al 2013); and lower richness inside PAs (Monaco et al 2007). These variable responses suggest that taxonomic indicators such as species richness and diversity indices are not useful indicators for PA-effectiveness evaluations due to their inability to integrate community-level responses to disturbance (Pelletier et al 2005;Mouillot et al 2006;Gaston et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that FPAs would provide some protection to at least a portion of the tigerfish population in the river. The positive effects that FPAs can have on freshwater biodiversity ( i.e ., increased local abundance or size classes) have been widely reported (Penha et al ., ; Reid et al ., ; Sanyanga et al ., ; Schram et al ., ; Suski & Cooke, ; Sztramko, ). For FPAs to be considered effective, it is essential that FPAs incorporate the lateral and longitudinal connectivity of the river system required for a species to access habitats required for spawning and feeding and, accounts for the human activities in the area under consideration (Bower et al ., ; Hermoso et al ., ; Wiederkehr et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numbers of threatened freshwater species continue to increase (Collen et al , ) and the populations of monitored species have experienced drastic declines since the 1970s (an average of 76% according to WWF, ). Some examples of the positive effects that protected areas can have on freshwater biodiversity have been reported, such as increased local abundance or size classes of some fish species (Cucherousset et al , ; Suski and Cooke, ; Penha et al , ). However, these studies have examined only a small group of species of commercial interest following the commencement of special management activities (e.g.…”
Section: Need For Strengthening the Effectiveness Of Protected Areas mentioning
confidence: 99%