2014
DOI: 10.1107/s205252061303268x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the performance of density functional theory in optimizing molecular crystal structure parameters

Abstract: This paper assesses the performance of plane-wave density functional theory calculations at returning reliable structural information for molecular crystal structures where the primary intermolecular interactions are either hydrogen bonding or dispersion interactions. The computed structures are compared with input structures obtained from the Cambridge Structural Database, and assessed in terms of crystal packing similarities, unit-cell volume and shape, short contact distances and hydrogen-bond distances. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The errors are not systematic; the mean errors in lattice vector lengths are merely À0.03 Å and +0.04 Å for the FIT and W99rev6311P5 force fields respectively. PBE-TS reproduces crystal geometries very well, 27,33 but not lattice energies. 34 Of course, an energy model must perform well on both energies and geometries to be useful and a benchmark study really should consider both.…”
Section: Lattice Parameters and Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The errors are not systematic; the mean errors in lattice vector lengths are merely À0.03 Å and +0.04 Å for the FIT and W99rev6311P5 force fields respectively. PBE-TS reproduces crystal geometries very well, 27,33 but not lattice energies. 34 Of course, an energy model must perform well on both energies and geometries to be useful and a benchmark study really should consider both.…”
Section: Lattice Parameters and Geometriesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…34,35 To avoid this, the proton was also fixed in position in the two problematic optimisations: r1s2-f and r2s2-f. Hydrogen atom-only optimisation was also carried out, but the maximum forces on the heavy atoms were two orders of magnitude larger than optimisation involving all atom positions and the ordering of predicted carbon chemical shift assignments was also found to match poorly with experimental data. The behaviour of the SSHB in 2FS-INA was problematic in the geometry optimisations, with the proton being transferred in some of the calculations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rietveld refinements of the structure of ε-glycine were carried-out using TOPAS-Academic (Coelho, 2005) starting from the coordinates in ref. 37 All non-hydrogen atoms were refined with a common isotropic thermal parameter and the displacement parameters of the D-atoms were set equal to 1.5 times this value. Lead, tungsten carbide and nickel were also included in the refinement models.…”
Section: Structure Solution and Refinementmentioning
confidence: 99%