2018
DOI: 10.3390/rs10010049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Performance of a Low-Cost Method for Video-Monitoring the Water Surface and Bed Level in the Swash Zone of Natural Beaches

Abstract: A method to continuously measure bed and water levels along a cross-shore transect of vertical poles is evaluated. This remote sensing based method uses video imagery of swash flows propagating past an array of vertical poles buried on the beach face. Using datasets collected at two beaches in Chile, the method is compared against measurements obtained with conventional co-localized instruments: LiDAR and ultrasonic distance meters. The present video swash pole technique shows good skill in retrieving swash zo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Past field studies analyzed the cross-shore transformation of surf zone waves using visual estimates of the free surface obtained from a combination of video cameras and photopoles (Mizuguchi, 1982;Ebersole & Hughes, 1987). The presence of splashes around the poles (Ibaceta et al, 2018) and the errors associated with the pixel resolution limit the accuracy of the measurements to several centimeters in the surf zone. Although generally used in laboratory conditions (Flick et al, 1981), capacitance and resistive types of wave gauges were used very early in the field to estimate surface elevation spectra in the shoaling region (Tucker & Charnock, 1954;Simpson, 1969;Flick et al, 1979) and in the surf zone (Thornton et al, 1976;Gonçalo, 1978;Thornton & Guza, 1983).…”
Section: Direct Measurements Of Surf Zone Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past field studies analyzed the cross-shore transformation of surf zone waves using visual estimates of the free surface obtained from a combination of video cameras and photopoles (Mizuguchi, 1982;Ebersole & Hughes, 1987). The presence of splashes around the poles (Ibaceta et al, 2018) and the errors associated with the pixel resolution limit the accuracy of the measurements to several centimeters in the surf zone. Although generally used in laboratory conditions (Flick et al, 1981), capacitance and resistive types of wave gauges were used very early in the field to estimate surface elevation spectra in the shoaling region (Tucker & Charnock, 1954;Simpson, 1969;Flick et al, 1979) and in the surf zone (Thornton et al, 1976;Gonçalo, 1978;Thornton & Guza, 1983).…”
Section: Direct Measurements Of Surf Zone Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the coastal video monitoring techniques, ground-sensing approaches by means of camera systems are widely used, allowing the investigation of coastal processes with high temporal and spatial resolution, with optimal accuracy. Numerous alternative or complementary uses are also pursued, with applications related to coastal hydrodynamics [1][2][3][4], morphodynamics [5][6][7], or quality monitoring (e.g., seagrass) [8,9]. Moreover, the use of low-cost devices and public resources has recently become a focus of attention and is being further explored [10][11][12].…”
Section: Image Classification-coastal Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ongoing widespread dissemination of digital systems for video monitoring allowed the development of innovative approaches to automatically obtain and process data along coastal areas. Previous studies have considered the time series of optical images to extract hydrodynamic properties of nearshore waves and currents, swash and runup [4], breaking wave, measures of breaking intensity [5,6], wave period, and wavelength (by monitoring a single pixel in the image over time), wave celerity [7], wave dissipation [8], attenuation [9], and alongshore currents [10]. These studies followed a supervised approach to establish or detect the physical wave parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%