1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1166(199906)14:6<421::aid-gps932>3.0.co;2-y
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Assessing the pain of people with cognitive impairment
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
71
23
10
1
Citation Types
4
58
0
2
Year Published
Range
2000
20002026
2026Publication Types
Select...
83
8
8
1
Relationship
0
100
Authors
Journals
Cited by 100 publications
(64 citation statements)
References 24 publications
4
58
0
2
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Another possibility, as mentioned above, is that NAs in this study had shorter work experience on average than RNs and were not as familiar with the residents as the RNs. Cook et al. (1999) indicated many people with cognitive impairment can report present pain using a dichotomous response, but they found it hard to report other pain characteristics, which is similar to the finding in this study.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 84%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Another possibility, as mentioned above, is that NAs in this study had shorter work experience on average than RNs and were not as familiar with the residents as the RNs. Cook et al. (1999) indicated many people with cognitive impairment can report present pain using a dichotomous response, but they found it hard to report other pain characteristics, which is similar to the finding in this study.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 84%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Like other studies of pain assessment [17‐21], the results of this research show underestimation of patient pain by nurses, both for patients who were cognitively impaired and for those who were not. Thus, staff underestimated pain even for patients whose pain reports have been shown to be highly reliable [29].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…The second was to examine relationships between those ratings of pain intensity and several measures of clinical status (e.g., depression, functional independence, behavioral signs of discomfort) and treatment (medication usage, length of stay). Consistent with previous research [17‐21], we expected nurse ratings to be lower than patient ratings of pain. Also consistent with previous research [23,24], we expected to find nurse ratings to correlate more highly with treatment than patient ratings.…”
Section: Introduction
supporting
confidence: 67%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Herr et al (2006;Horgas et al, 2009) made a review of the fourteen scales and stated that these tools were still in an early stage of development, and required more precise psychometric elaboration before they would be able to be recommended to wider clinical employment. Similar conclusions are made by Cook et al (1999). Most of the pain assessment tools originated on the basis of work with patients with tumour diseases, who were cognitively intact and could report their feelings and sensations (Morrison et al, 1998).…”
Section: Health Management 48
supporting
confidence: 60%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Another possibility, as mentioned above, is that NAs in this study had shorter work experience on average than RNs and were not as familiar with the residents as the RNs. Cook et al. (1999) indicated many people with cognitive impairment can report present pain using a dichotomous response, but they found it hard to report other pain characteristics, which is similar to the finding in this study.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 84%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Like other studies of pain assessment [17‐21], the results of this research show underestimation of patient pain by nurses, both for patients who were cognitively impaired and for those who were not. Thus, staff underestimated pain even for patients whose pain reports have been shown to be highly reliable [29].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…The second was to examine relationships between those ratings of pain intensity and several measures of clinical status (e.g., depression, functional independence, behavioral signs of discomfort) and treatment (medication usage, length of stay). Consistent with previous research [17‐21], we expected nurse ratings to be lower than patient ratings of pain. Also consistent with previous research [23,24], we expected to find nurse ratings to correlate more highly with treatment than patient ratings.…”
Section: Introduction
supporting
confidence: 67%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Herr et al (2006;Horgas et al, 2009) made a review of the fourteen scales and stated that these tools were still in an early stage of development, and required more precise psychometric elaboration before they would be able to be recommended to wider clinical employment. Similar conclusions are made by Cook et al (1999). Most of the pain assessment tools originated on the basis of work with patients with tumour diseases, who were cognitively intact and could report their feelings and sensations (Morrison et al, 1998).…”
Section: Health Management 48
supporting
confidence: 60%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Another possibility, as mentioned above, is that NAs in this study had shorter work experience on average than RNs and were not as familiar with the residents as the RNs. Cook et al. (1999) indicated many people with cognitive impairment can report present pain using a dichotomous response, but they found it hard to report other pain characteristics, which is similar to the finding in this study.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 84%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Like other studies of pain assessment [17‐21], the results of this research show underestimation of patient pain by nurses, both for patients who were cognitively impaired and for those who were not. Thus, staff underestimated pain even for patients whose pain reports have been shown to be highly reliable [29].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 71%
“…The second was to examine relationships between those ratings of pain intensity and several measures of clinical status (e.g., depression, functional independence, behavioral signs of discomfort) and treatment (medication usage, length of stay). Consistent with previous research [17‐21], we expected nurse ratings to be lower than patient ratings of pain. Also consistent with previous research [23,24], we expected to find nurse ratings to correlate more highly with treatment than patient ratings.…”
Section: Introduction
supporting
confidence: 67%
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Herr et al (2006;Horgas et al, 2009) made a review of the fourteen scales and stated that these tools were still in an early stage of development, and required more precise psychometric elaboration before they would be able to be recommended to wider clinical employment. Similar conclusions are made by Cook et al (1999). Most of the pain assessment tools originated on the basis of work with patients with tumour diseases, who were cognitively intact and could report their feelings and sensations (Morrison et al, 1998).…”
Section: Health Management 48
supporting
confidence: 60%
Scite is an AI-powered platform that helps researchers discover and evaluate scientific literature through Smart Citations, showing whether studies support or contradict a claim. Now part of Research Solutions, Scite has indexed 1.6B+ citations, partners with 30+ publishers, and serves 2M users worldwide.
Resources
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2026 Scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.
