2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10591-017-9407-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Mediating Effect of Relationship Dynamics Between Perceptions of Problematic Media Use and Relationship Satisfaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Overuse of social networking sites (e.g., Facebook) may also contribute to family conflict due to reduced time spent with family or inattention during face-to-face conversations (Sharaievska & Stodolska, 2017). Disrupted communication pattern may also mediate the relationship between problematic use of media (including smartphone use, online gaming, and video watching) and marital dissatisfaction (Spencer, Lambertsen, Hubler, & Burr, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overuse of social networking sites (e.g., Facebook) may also contribute to family conflict due to reduced time spent with family or inattention during face-to-face conversations (Sharaievska & Stodolska, 2017). Disrupted communication pattern may also mediate the relationship between problematic use of media (including smartphone use, online gaming, and video watching) and marital dissatisfaction (Spencer, Lambertsen, Hubler, & Burr, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results show (with the limitation of studying only 75 heterosexual couples) that partners who perceive higher levels of love in their relationship actually participate in less Facebook maintenance behavior and vice versa. Spencer et al (2017) explore the interrelation of problematic media use, relationship satisfaction and demandwithdraw/criticism-defensiveness patterns. As foreseen, the demand-withdraw/criticism-defensiveness patterns were found to be negatively associated with relationship satisfaction, while the association between problematic media use and relationship satisfaction was partially mediated by the same.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Se generaron estudios para identificar la presencia del phubbing en las relaciones de pareja (McDaniel & Coyne, 2016;Coyne et al, 2011;Lenhart & Duggan, 2014), que reconocen que la pareja desarrolla conductas, reglas y rutinas para estructurar su comunicación en el diario vivir (Vitak & Ellison, 2018). Entre los hallazgos que documentan algunas consecuencias del phubbing en la relación de pareja destacan su relación con la satisfacción marital (González-Rivera, Segura-Abreu & Urbistondo-Rodríguez, 2018; Spencer et al, 2017;Wang, Xie, Wang, Wang & Lei, 2017), con los conflictos en la relación (McDaniel, 2015;Robert & Davis, 2016), su impacto en el desarrollo de celos en la persona ignorada (Krasnova, Abramova, Notter & Baumann, 2016), su contribución en el empobrecimiento de la comunicación (Chotpitayasunondh & Douglas, 2018a, 2018bVanden, Antheunis & Schouten, 2016) y su efecto sobre en el bienestar psicológico de la pareja (McDaniel & Coyne, 2016;Robert & Davis, 2017;Vaterlaus & Tulane, 2019 Phubbing, comunicación tecnológica y calidad de la relación de pareja Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología con relación a los nuevos modos de comunicación digital, sentir, funciones y privacidad. Además, en la construcción de la escala se utilizó como referentes teóricos: la teoría de Gestión Privada de Comunicación de Petronio (2002) y la Auto-divulgación de Altman y Taylor (1973).…”
Section: Phubbingunclassified