2014
DOI: 10.1117/12.2039418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the impact of image manipulation on users' perceptions of deception

Abstract: Generally, we expect images to be an honest reflection of reality. However, this assumption is undermined by the new image editing technology, which allows for easy manipulation and distortion of digital contents. Our understanding of the implications related to the use of a manipulated data is lagging behind. In this paper we propose to exploit crowdsourcing tools in order to analyze the impact of different types of manipulation on users' perceptions of deception. Our goal is to gain significant insights abou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We suspected that participant link clicking on pet profiles and sociability scores may be negatively impacted if photos appeared digitally altered. Past research shows that image manipulations involving splicing where photo elements differ from the original content can elicit feelings of deception by viewers in a context-dependent manner [ 32 ]; while image modifications for humans were considered generally acceptable for the purpose of photography, photo alterations for advertisements and journalism increased the perceived deception of viewers [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suspected that participant link clicking on pet profiles and sociability scores may be negatively impacted if photos appeared digitally altered. Past research shows that image manipulations involving splicing where photo elements differ from the original content can elicit feelings of deception by viewers in a context-dependent manner [ 32 ]; while image modifications for humans were considered generally acceptable for the purpose of photography, photo alterations for advertisements and journalism increased the perceived deception of viewers [ 32 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was hypothesized that participant link clicking on pet profiles and sociability scores may be negatively impacted if photos appeared digitally altered. Past research shows that image manipulations involving splicing where photo elements differ from the original content can elicit feelings of deception by viewers in a context-dependent manner [23]; while image modifications for humans were considered generally acceptable for the purpose of photography, photo alterations for advertisements and journalism increased the perceived deception of viewers [23].…”
Section: Awareness Of Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two probabilities are assigned a weight ( 1 and 2 , respectively). The linear combination in (7) represents the probability of an image to be fake: ( ). If this probability is higher than 50%, then the image is classified as fake, otherwise as real, as can be seen in Figure 6.…”
Section: Image Forensics and Textual Analysis Approaches Combinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a serious threat, as it has been proven that visual content can affect public opinion and sentiments [2,7,8], leading to severe consequences. For example, two spectators of the Boston Marathon were falsely portrayed as suspects of the bombings, and their picture even hit the headlines (see Figure 1(a)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%