2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-017-1531-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the efficacy of aerial culling of introduced wild deer in New Zealand with analytical decomposition of predation risk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effects of management (sustained aerial control and WAROs) were less clear. We emphasise that the monitoring is for all ungulates present on PCL (Table 1) The lower ungulate occupancy rates and conditional abundances at non-woody sites likely reflects the greater vulnerability of ungulates on New Zealand's PCL to helicopterbased shooting in these habitats (deer: Challies 1977;Latham et al 2018;Himalayan tahr: Tustin & Challies 1978). Related to this, commercial harvesting of red deer is currently more economically viable in non-woody habitats (Warburton et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of management (sustained aerial control and WAROs) were less clear. We emphasise that the monitoring is for all ungulates present on PCL (Table 1) The lower ungulate occupancy rates and conditional abundances at non-woody sites likely reflects the greater vulnerability of ungulates on New Zealand's PCL to helicopterbased shooting in these habitats (deer: Challies 1977;Latham et al 2018;Himalayan tahr: Tustin & Challies 1978). Related to this, commercial harvesting of red deer is currently more economically viable in non-woody habitats (Warburton et al 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Macropods that are culled in non-commercial shooting programs often have their carcasses left intact (Gowans et al 2010;Morgan and Pegler 2010) and in situ as per standard practice in 'culling-to-waste' shooting programs ( Fig. 3b, d; Pauli and Buskirk 2007;Latham et al 2017). Macropods shot for commercial use are typically 'dressed' at their point of harvest.…”
Section: Commercial Macropod Harvestingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several factors contribute to the risk that helicopter shooting with Pb-based bullets may pose to scavenging wildlife. First, animals shot from helicopters are not harvested or otherwise processed by operators (culling-to-waste; Latham et al 2017), leaving whole animals available to scavengers. Second, repeat shooting is common practice with helicopter shooting, meaning that two or more bullets are routinely fired into animals (mean of 2.4 bullet wounds for feral camels and feral horses; Hampton et al 2014b, The images were captured in the same way as described by Legagneux et al (2014), namely by placing camera traps on the carcasses of shot animals (Forsyth et al 2014).…”
Section: Helicopter Shootingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the three mobile survey methods, we estimated the probability of detection as P(detection| presence) = P(Detection + |Presence + , Search + ) using data collected concurrently from GPS-collared wallabies and survey paths (as per methodology in Latham et al 2018). P(detection|presence) represents the probability of detecting a collared wallaby given that the animal was at a point location within the field of view of the observer when the observer searched the area.…”
Section: Identifying Detections Of Collared Wallabiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of detecting an animal using a given surveillance method can be affected by the habitat where the animal occurs. For example, some habitats with dense vegetation offer more opportunities for concealment thereby reducing detectability (Caughley 1977, Green et al 2013, Latham et al 2018. Collecting data on the detection probabilities of different methods when used in different habitats enables correction factors for habitat biases to be applied (Samuel et al 1987, Green et al 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%