2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01656.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing reliable and clinically significant change on Health of the Nation Outcome Scales: method for displaying longitudinal data

Abstract: Our study proposes a methodological framework for computing RCSC normative data on a widely used outcome scale and for identifying different degrees of clinical change.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
53
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(21 reference statements)
4
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar assumptions were made for the SOFAS: the reliable change was a variation of 10 points, and we assumed 51 as the cutoff point to distinguish between serious (<51) and moderate (≥51) impairment in social/ occupational functioning [18].…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar assumptions were made for the SOFAS: the reliable change was a variation of 10 points, and we assumed 51 as the cutoff point to distinguish between serious (<51) and moderate (≥51) impairment in social/ occupational functioning [18].…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conducted a categorical analysis on the HoNOS total score modifications using the criteria for reliable and clinically significant change [18]. According to these criteria, a change on the HoNOS total score was reliably detected when it was ≥7 points.…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parabiaghi et al (2005) applied a measure of Reliable and Clinically Significant Change (RCSC) to HoNOS data in order to compare outcomes. Reliable change (RC) was calculated as follows:…”
Section: Using Honos To Compare Provider Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lo scopo di questo test e assicurarsi che il cambiamento osservato in un individuo: 1) sia al di la di quello che potrebbe essere attribuito aU'errore di misura o al caso (cambiamento riproducibile), e 2) porti il paziente da un livello di gravita clinico ad uno non clinico (significativo cambiamento clinico). In questa analisi abbiamo considerato migliorati in modo riproducibile e clinicamente significativo i pazienti che avevano una riduzione di almeno 7 punti HoNOS tra i punteggi totali della scala di ammissione e dimissione (cambiamento riproducibile) ed erano scesi al di sotto del cut-off'di 12, cut-off che separa la categoria dei pazienti gravi da quelli non gravi (Parabiaghi et al, 2005).…”
Section: Reliable and Clinically Significant Change (Rcsc)unclassified