Assessing Item Content-Relevance in Sport Psychology Scale-Construction Research: Issues and Recommendations

Dunn, John G.H.; Bouffard, Marcel; Rogers, W. Todd

doi:10.1207/s15327841mpee0301_2

Cited by 167 publications

(136 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

105

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The nine judges competed in a range of team (n = 6) and individual (n = 3) sports at club (n = 5), county (n = 3), and national (n = 1) level standard. The judges were initially required to read each item, then circle the social support dimension to which they felt the item belonged (Dunn, Bouffard, & Rogers, 1999). For all 16 items, at least eight of the judges correctly assigned them to their respective dimensions.…”

Section: Initial Scale Constructionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The PASS-Q: The Perceived Available Support in Sport Questionnaire

Freeman

Coffee

Rees

2011

Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This article provides initial evidence for the construct validity of the Perceived Available Support in Sport Questionnaire (PASS-Q), which assesses emotional, esteem, informational, and tangible support. In Study 1, confirmatory factor analyses provided evidence for a four-dimension factor structure. Correlations supported hypothesized relationships between the PASS-Q dimensions and the Social Support Survey questions (Richman, Rosenfeld, & Hardy, 1993). In Study 2, the four-dimension factor structure was supported in an independent sample. Further, higher levels of perceived available emotional, esteem, informational, and tangible support were associated with higher levels of self-confidence and lower levels of burnout. Researchers are encouraged to use the PASS-Q to examine the effects of perceived available support in sport contexts.

show abstract

Section: Initial Scale Constructionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The PASS-Q: The Perceived Available Support in Sport Questionnaire

Freeman

Coffee

Rees

2011

Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Por ello, en las investigaciones cuyas muestras estén compuestas por sujetos expertos se han de identificar y desarrollar criterios específicos para localizar a sujetos que encajen con el perfil de experto requerido (Dunn, Bouffard, y Rogers, 1999). Los investigadores han de cerciorarse que los criterios de selección de la muestra determinados son suficientemente rigurosos para asegurar que los sujetos son considerados expertos (Abraham, Collins, y Martindale, 2006).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Análisis del proceso formativo en jugadores expertos: validación de instrumento / Analysis of expert players’ training process: validation of tools

García-Martín¹,

Medina²,

Godoy³

2016

rimcafd

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…For this reason, the basic recommendations that Dunn, Bouffard and Rogers (1999) establish for the creation of measurement instruments that seek to determine their content validity were followed. The large sample of experts participating in the 2nd phase (n = 129) meets the requirements established in the literature in terms of the number of experts, when compared with previous papers presented ( Garcia-Martín et al, 2016;García-Santos et al, 2016;González-Espinosa et al, 2017;Villarejo et al, 2014).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Unfavorable critical moments and way of facing them from the futsal coach’s point of view through ad hoc questionnaire. [Momentos críticos desfavorables y manera de afrontarlos desde la perspectiva del entrenador de futsal a través de un cuestionario ad hoc].

Domínguez

Ruano

Ruíz-Pérez

et al. 2017

Rev. int. cienc. deporte

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this study, a designed ad hoc questionnaire was constructed and validated to investigate the opinion of coaches about the concept of unfavorable critical moment in futsal, and the coincident use of goalkeeper as an outfield player strategy (5vs4) with that critical moment, which is a decisive step towards theoretical and methodological convergences. A total of 129 coaches belonging to teams of divisions 1st, 2nd and 2nd B participated in the questionnaire, which was validated by the judgment of experts thru calculating the content validity through the Aiken's V coefficient (Aiken, 1980(Aiken, , 1985. The results of the qualitative study revealed the importance that futsal coaches give to the maximum difference of 2 goals, and to the last 8 min of the game as maximum exponents of criticality, also to the importance of the 5th accumulated foul as a precipitant factor of an unfavorable critical moment in maximum equality matches. In addition, coaches manifested that interactive effects of score-line, remaining time and accumulated fouls could be the trigger of unfavorable critical moments, and using the goalkeeper as an outfield player strategy is a common practice to solve these situations. The values obtained in 19 of the 20 items (V> 0.90) attest that the content of the questionnaire is valid to show that the sample of futsal coaches understands the concept of criticality. The implications of the study contribute to a more specific knowledge of the futsal game and at the practical level the possibility of using this information to establish training objectives related to different stress conditions. Key words: Coaching; expert coach assessment; validity content; criticality, goalkeeper as an outfield player; futsal. AbstractCorrespondence/correspondencia: Cesar Méndez Domínguez Facultad de Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. España Email: cesarmendez4@yahoo.es A través de la construcción y validación de un cuestionario diseñado ad hoc se trató de investigar el pensamiento del entrenador relacionado con el concepto de momento crítico desfavorable en futsal, y la utilización del portero-jugador (5vs4) coincidente con el momento crítico, como un paso decisivo hacia convergencias teóricas y metodológicas. Un total de 129 entrenadores pertenecientes a equipos de 1ª, 2ª y 2ª B participaron en el cuestionario, que fue validado mediante el juicio de expertos calculando el índice de validez de contenido a través del coeficiente Aiken's V (Aiken,1980(Aiken, , 1985. Los resultados del estudio cualitativo revelan la importancia que otorgan los entrenadores de futsal a la diferencia máxima de 2 goles y a los últimos 8 minutos del partido como máximos exponentes de la criticidad, y a la importancia de la 5ª falta como factor precipitante de un momento crítico desfavorable en partidos de máxima igualdad. Además, muestran acuerdo en que los efectos interactivos de marcador, tiempo y faltas pueden ser el desencadenante de los momentos críticos desfavorables, y que es una práctica ...

show abstract

Assessing Item Content-Relevance in Sport Psychology Scale-Construction Research: Issues and Recommendations

Cited by 167 publications

References 32 publications

The PASS-Q: The Perceived Available Support in Sport Questionnaire

The PASS-Q: The Perceived Available Support in Sport Questionnaire

Análisis del proceso formativo en jugadores expertos: validación de instrumento / Analysis of expert players’ training process: validation of tools

Unfavorable critical moments and way of facing them from the futsal coach’s point of view through ad hoc questionnaire. [Momentos críticos desfavorables y manera de afrontarlos desde la perspectiva del entrenador de futsal a través de un cuestionario ad hoc].

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About