2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2022.114470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing engagement features in an observational study of mental health apps in college students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The prompt could alternatively be delayed to a more optimal moment where a response is more likely. Similarly, previous research has suggested that feedback can help respondents remain engaged with mental health smartphone applications (Melcher et al, 2022) and data on moments in Note. Higher scores here represent lower levels of the state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The prompt could alternatively be delayed to a more optimal moment where a response is more likely. Similarly, previous research has suggested that feedback can help respondents remain engaged with mental health smartphone applications (Melcher et al, 2022) and data on moments in Note. Higher scores here represent lower levels of the state.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Another useful approach is to employ tools and procedures that make it easy to monitor passive data quality in near real time. As an example, we have created interactive visualizations on the Data Portal of our researcher dashboard 20 to allow study staff or clinicians a simple way to track participant data. These graphs are automatically updated each day and contain information about data coverage (as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the studies differed in their clinical populations (patients with schizophrenia; college students with stress, anxiety, and depression; patients with depression using mindLAMP to augment therapy), they all collected two common digital phenotyping data streams: geolocation and accelerometer data. Each study presented participants with a symptom survey at least every three days [13][14][15][16] . For completeness, all participants in each study (including those that were discontinued because of non-adherence to protocol) were included in this analysis.…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the studies differed in their clinical populations (patients with schizophrenia or depression/anxiety; college students with stress/anxiety), they all collected two common digital phenotyping data streams: geolocation (GPS) and accelerometer data. Each study presented participants with a symptom survey at least every 3 days 12–16. All participants in each study (including those who were discontinued for non-adherence to protocol) were included in this analysis.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%